We built q.e.d to strengthen scientific critical thinking, evolve evidence-based answers, and empower research decisions across disciplines and time.

GenAI evaluation presents persistent challenges across applications. Drawing from human reviews, we found that one metric could simultaneously measure a system coverage and at the same time be used to improve it’s precision.

On paper, academia is a dream for curious, independent people. In reality, the publish-or-perish cycle, with peer-review in its heart, dramatically limits the creativity of scientific work.

The scientific method, humanity’s most successful approach to uncovering how the world works, doesn’t rely on “truth” as much as it relies on validity. In fact, “valid” often serves as a sharper, more useful stand-in for the vague concept of “true”.