After months of working on a grant proposal, it can be difficult to see it with the distance of a reviewer. Unclear framing, gaps in logic, an underdeveloped feasibility case, or claims that outrun the evidence can weaken otherwise strong science. In this webinar, Dr. Angela Andersen, Prof. Barak Rotblat, and Dr. Lior Onn-Sorek show how to critically review a proposal before it reaches a funding panel. They share practical guidance on strengthening your scientific argument, discuss the dos and don’ts of using AI throughout the grant-writing process, and demonstrate how QED Science uses structured, AI-assisted review to surface potential weaknesses in a proposal’s background, methodology, feasibility, logic, and internal consistency, while keeping scientific judgment in the hands of the researcher.