I used this on some of my work and I have to say, it's very impressive. Thank you for making such a useful tool! Is the plan to move to a subscription model eventually?

It’s brilliant. Really useful feedback in 10 min or less. Somethings were known to us. Others were thoughtful—if a little ambitious!

I have tried it out! It is great! I will implement this in teaching in my seminars! Great work!

Amazing analysis of the papers I've tried. Equal to an expert reviewer.

That's so cool!!! Does It work with any topic???

We have been making the most of it! Extremely helpful. Try it!!!!

Brilliant! Good luck @OdedRechavi!!!

Hey @OdedRechavi, our group (@Peptidome and @TD_Cummins_PhD) gave @qedScience a try on two manuscripts. Pretty damned good!!

This is going to be a fantastic and tremendously useful tool! Does the system expect a properly written paper or could it also critically evaluate any scientific document - likes of proposals, short reports etc which may not be a well structured manuscript?

In the meantime, while waiting, i tired q.e.d. @OdedRechavi Despite neurotechnology, electrophysiology and neuroscience is not in their portfolio, it actually performed very well. It was fast. It highlighted some sentences that can be finetuned to stick to what data actually shows and identify gaps between results and claims. I was very impressed.

I stumbled upon this last week developed by a team of amazing people including famous @OdedRechavi.. This works and does give constructive ideas 💡 Do check it out #science #ai #review

Incredible by @OdedRechavi ... an AI thingy-bop that reviews your manuscript with a very high bar and takes no prisoners. But you can do this in your pajamas and no one gets to see it. Takes a while but once you get the results you'll know why.

@odedrechavi.bsky.social’s @qedscience.bsky.social rocks. Tried it on - not even fully topically supported - draft MS and it is bang on with flagging the gaps and suggesting solutions. #QED #qedrocks

What Oded Rechavi is building is the most logical way to publish science, this can be something great if we all join in

THIS IS SO COOL!!! EVERYONE who has ever written a paper needs to try this ASAP. Take your favorite paper that you have written, put it in, and I guarantee you will be blown away by the feedback.

Even with a neuroimmunology-heavy manuscript (which qed explicitly warns is not well represented in the training data), this performed remarkably well. About on par with a rigorous (but fair) and reasonably well-informed reviewer!

Kudos to the people behind @qedScience. Wish I had it for my last paper, so I could address the raised issues in the discussion. Really looking forward in applying it more often!

This is transformative!!

Awesome! Next ms draft goes to QED

Definitely try it !!!

This is absolutely brilliant — a true game-changer for science! 🚀👏

Well, well... It's already happening, friends @OdedRechavi created a brilliant AI initiative for paper reviews

Inqedible! Wish you the best of luck with this 🙌

Very reasonable AI analysis of manuscripts. Believe me, I have tested it. Unfortunately, it does not work with pure chemistry.

AMAZING release for the whole scientific community!!!

This is fantastic! Is it possible to provide a DOI instead of uploading a paper? couldn't find this functionality...

Just tried qed for the first time today; hugely impressed by how it analyzed a paper, even though it was not a straightforward manuscript and had both experimental and computational components. I'm super excited to see how it develops in the long run.

@OdedRechavi this is the BEST AI on manuscript editorial help I have seen. Bye Grok, Chattie, etc. I am a Q.E.D. covert. BTW, Oded, what is the acronym for?

Amazing tool by @qedScience !!! You should try it. It’s the future, today. Congrats the team. Can’t imagine how Science is going to look like in 10 years, from bench to dissemination. Accelerate!

Such a lovely, life-changing platform, congratulations to the @OdedRechavi @qedScience teams.

OMG, it is a F.... grounding machine I am addicted to it!!!! thanks @OdedRechavi and the other people behind it now I only have to republish 99% of my papers 🤣

I've used qed several times (on own papers) & found it incredibly helpful: 1) it analyzes main and secondary arguments and how strongly each is supported. 2) it beautifully explains what is missing + (real!) refs to papers/methods that could help. 3) it rates novelty and impact.

A website that analyzes a manuscript and identifies strengths and weaknesses… Highly recommended.

It is unfair to name @qedScience in the acknowledgment section only… has done more than many coauthors.

I have been using this lately and it’s absolutely revolutionary! Same tool but for grants could be amazing.

👉 Check it out and join the movement

Un intento para iniciar una importante conversación.

Check this out 🙌🏽🙌🏽🙌🏽🙌🏽🙌🏽

Just tried it and it is amazing! Thank you @OdedRechavi and team! 🙏

Really amazing initiative from @odedrechavi.bsky.social & Co at @qedscience.bsky.social: an AI tool to critically evaluate your work & get constructive feedback to help you assess/improve it.

This is amazing and moves scientific publishing into the modern age in a MAJOR way. @qedscience.bsky.social by @odedrechavi.bsky.social and team... are my game-changing life-hack recommendations for all scientists!

I am testing it now and my impression is “wow”! The identification of statistics/bioinformatics gaps & flaws is amazing. qed is not a PI who will guide you, but there’s still ample space for human intervention!

Been using it for a while now and even had a meeting with the team. Can say that it’s 100% worth it and will give you ideas for your manuscript. Can’t wait to see what it becomes!

This is very cool, Oded. All the very best 😊👍

I played with QED today and it was really super fun.

Love it! Thanks for this!

Tried @qedscience.bsky.social on one of our recent published manuscripts. This is going to change things.

It is a phenomenal project!!! I’ve long hoped for a place like this after being exhausted by bogus reviewer attacks. I signed up on qedscience.com but haven’t received the access link (spam checked). Could you help look into it? Thank you!

Excellent idea. I wish we could replace human reviewers (and their inherent biases) with AI some day soon. Be it in publishing or in grant evaluation.

Love the output! Not only does it articulate the strengths and concerns, it suggests textual and experimental solutions. Astonishingly good!

This is awesome! Can it also review and evaluate grant proposals?

I tried out Q.E.D. with an unfinished manuscript and it really does its job! Well done. It suggests meaningful experiments and for lazy ones it provides instructions how to discuss it instead if possible. Highly recommended for everyone to try 👏

Thanks. This post and comments have the vibes of old Twitter when there was so much cool science and people to interact with. We still have hope!

That's the kind of problem you want to have! 💥 When servers crash from response, it means you've struck a nerve in the academic community. The fact that researchers are rushing to upload papers shows how desperately needed this alternative is. Exciting times! 🚀📚

q e d

This is a very cool idea. The platform is very nicely designed and intuitive. But the most important thing is its scope, and I feel grateful for people having thought about it.

YES

This is wonderful! I'm going to start using it TODAY.

This is an absolutely phenomenal tool to help with scientific papers from the brilliant @OdedRechavi and his team. Give it a try!!

Hmm … heads up researchers and academics! @OdedRechavi

Future of publications! 🎯👍🏽

Great effort! Best wishes

I highly recommend for those who like to have an extra pair of A-eyes before submitting for peer review (which might end up being similar). This helps identify limitations in a study and provides solutions to address them, without the typical Reviewer #2 insufferable vibe.

An amazing tool, tested it on a paper I know well and the criticism was spot-on! Love the name too! 😃

Awesome

Since I discovered it a few weeks ago, I have been using it for all my papers. It is amazing. Try it out right now!!!!

That’s an amazing idea! Have a look and spread the word, folks.

This is one of the most interesting AI apps to emerge in 2025 for scientists who do original research they aim to publish in leading academic journals.

Very cool!!!

So I tried it and it is super impressive. I am really worried though that reviewers will plop papers in here and use the output as their review. I am actually worried it will make passing peer review harder, based on its output of a published paper – thoughts on this?

Tried it and it’s a real revelation!

To all your scientists out there, q.e.d Science is the paper analysis tool you’ve been dreaming of. It's helped me in my research and my own writing. Link in the comments. Brought to you by the brilliant minds Oded Rechavi, Niv Samuel Mastboim, Itamar Zigel and many others!

Super cool! Finally this exists 😍 I've always thought this will be the way of the future. Bypass journals and just rely on crowdsource feedback and comments the authors can respond to live.

I have evaluated a few papers with #QEDscience already. It’s extraordinarily useful, helps you to tighten up weak areas in papers before submission. It should be part of everyone’s publishing workflow.

Tool is great, have been sharing it with students since last week, they can now see the ‘holes’ in their work. Just a bit worried nothing will get published as answers generate new questions and reviewers will be using QED to evaluate manuscripts. But it’s brilliant! 🙏

Would recommend. Have been testing early versions and it has been very helpful!

You will not forget the day you tried qedscience.com first @qedScience

Brilliant