Home
 /
Papers
 /
Cell Biology
 /
Selective autophagy of whole micronuclei suppresses chromosomal instability
Preprint
Open access
V1
Top 1% · Validated by QED

Selective autophagy of whole micronuclei suppresses chromosomal instability

Nikolaus A. Watson, Mattia Melli, Marco R. Cosenza +4 more
April 2026
 ·
bioRxiv
 ·
DOI 
10.64898/2026.04.03.716211
94
%
Reproducible
QED Impressions
This paper passed independent validation.
QED's automated review checked the evidence supporting each claim, the statistical methods, and whether the results are reproducible from the data provided.

It ranks in the top 1% of preprints assessed in Cell Biology this quarter.
Run full QED analysis
Read paper
Save

Why this is interesting

Discovering chromophagy—selective autophagy that completely digests whole micronuclei—this work overturns the assumption that chromosomal instability from mitotic errors is unrestrained, revealing an endogenous checkpoint that eliminates missegregated chromosomes before they drive catastrophic genome rearrangement.

QED claims analysis

Summary

Selective autophagy targets micronuclei with nuclear envelope defects for complete lysosomal degradation through a process termed chromophagy, which eliminates entrapped chromosomes from the genome, prevents intergenerational transmission of damaged chromosomal material, and suppresses micronucleus-mediated chromosomal instability by competing with the rupture pathway that otherwise leads to chromosome fragmentation and chromothripsis.

See full analysis
Main Claim 1 –

Autophagy delivers a substantial fraction of micronuclei to lysosomes

Supporting evidence

  • LC3B recruitment engulfs whole micronuclei and fuses with lysosomes
  • Micronucleus autophagy requires ATG7/ATG16L1 and ATG8/VPS34 machinery
Main Claim 2 –

Micronuclear rupture and autophagy are distinct, non-overlapping fates

Supporting evidence

  • Autophagy stimulation reduces rupture, while inhibition increases micronuclear rupture
Main Claim 3 –

Selective micronucleus autophagy targets nuclear envelope–defective micronuclei

Supporting evidence

  • Lagging chromosome–derived micronuclei undergo autophagy, unlike misaligned-derived micronuclei
  • BAF and Lamin B1 dissociation predicts autophagic micronucleus acidification
  • MKLP2 modulation and Lamin B1 overexpression rescue envelope defects
  • VRK1 activity promotes BAF dissociation and micronucleus autophagy targeting
Main Claim 4 –

Micronucleus acidification triggers complete lysosomal degradation of chromosomal DNA

Supporting evidence

  • Strand-seq confirms non-reciprocal chromosome loss after micronucleus acidification
  • Chromophagy blocks daughter-cell inheritance of micronucleus-derived chromosome fragments

Abstract

Chromosomal instability (CIN) arising from mitotic errors generates pervasive structural and numerical chromosome alterations fueling cancer evolution. Entrapment of missegregated chromosomes within micronuclei exacerbates CIN by fostering repeated rounds of aberrant mitotic segregation and, following micronucleus rupture, promoting catastrophic chromosomal rearrangement processes such as chromothripsis. Whether cellular mechanisms exist to restrain micronucleus-driven CIN has remained unclear. Developing a live-cell chromatin acidification sensor, we tracked micronuclei from genesis through subsequent cell cycles and observed frequent whole-micronucleus capture and acidification via the autophagy pathway. Autophagic targeting is selective for micronuclei with nuclear envelope defects seeded at mitotic exit. Our data indicate that these defects drive progressive loss of chromatin–nuclear envelope tethering, producing a mechanically altered state that is recognised by the autophagic machinery. Autophagy and rupture represent distinct micronuclear fates with opposing genomic consequences. Single-cell sequencing of fate-matched cells demonstrates complete digestion of the chromosomal contents of autophagy-targeted micronuclei, a process we term chromophagy (chromosome-autophagy). By eliminating micronuclei, chromophagy promotes chromosomal loss and arrests the intergenerational transmission of missegregated chromosomal material. This constrains the mutational consequences of micronucleation and suppresses micronucleus-mediated CIN.

Related papers

How the QED Score works

QED Score is a validated AI-based quality metric that evaluates life science papers on two dimensions: originality and validity. Each manuscript is anonymized, broken down into its claims and supporting evidence, and examined by specialized AI agents for statistical rigor, consistency across figures, and fit with the existing literature. Scores are percentile ranks, so they're comparable across fields. In blinded tests, expert professors sided with QED Score over journal rank in 75% of decisive cases.
Read the methodology

Free access for academic researchers

Create your free QED account to validate your research, strengthen grant proposals, and uncover scientific insights.
We've sent you an access link.
Please check your inbox.

Didn't get your email? Check your spam folder or reach out to info@qedscience.com

Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Looking for QED for pharma, biotech or life science organizations?