Home
 /
Papers
 /
Cell Biology
 /
Dystonia-associated Torsins sustain CLCC1 function to promote membrane fusion of the nuclear envelope for NPC biogenesis
Preprint
Open access
V1
Top 1% · Validated by QED

Dystonia-associated Torsins sustain CLCC1 function to promote membrane fusion of the nuclear envelope for NPC biogenesis

Daria Maslennikova, Harry Baird, Alessia Loffreda +11 more
November 2025
 ·
bioRxiv
 ·
DOI 
10.1101/2025.11.07.687155
94
%
Reproducible
QED Impressions
This paper passed independent validation.
QED's automated review checked the evidence supporting each claim, the statistical methods, and whether the results are reproducible from the data provided.

It ranks in the top 1% of preprints assessed in Cell Biology this quarter.
Run full QED analysis
Read paper
Save

Why this is interesting

Resolving a foundational mystery in cell biology, this work identifies CLCC1 as the nuclear envelope membrane fusogen during NPC biogenesis and establishes Torsins as its regulators, directly linking this mechanism to DYT1 dystonia and its treatment.

QED claims analysis

Summary

Torsins sustain the function of the conserved membrane protein CLCC1, which acts as a membrane fusogen to mediate inner and outer nuclear membrane fusion during nuclear pore complex biogenesis, and increased CLCC1 expression is sufficient to rescue the developmental and cellular defects caused by Torsin loss-of-function in both Drosophila and human cells, identifying CLCC1 as a therapeutic target for DYT1 dystonia.

See full analysis
Main Claim 1 –

dTorsin loss blocks INM–ONM fusion during NPC biogenesis

Supporting evidence

  • dTorsin loss causes germline arrest in both sexes
  • dTorsin requires N-terminal cysteines and G256, not ATPase activity
Main Claim 2 –

Torsin1AΔE localizes to NE blebs at membrane apposition

Main Claim 3 –

TurboID proximity labeling identifies CLCC1 as Torsin1A partner

Supporting evidence

  • AlphaFold predicts conserved Torsin–CLCC1 interaction across metazoans
  • FRET confirms direct CLCC1–Torsin1A interaction in cells
  • CLCC1 and Torsin homologs co-occur across metazoan evolution
Main Claim 4 –

CLCC1/dClcc1 loss phenocopies Torsin-dependent NE fusion defects

Supporting evidence

  • Disrupting dTorsin–dClcc1 interface prevents dtorsinKO phenotypic rescue

Abstract

DYT1 early-onset dystonia is a severe, incurable disorder of the central nervous system caused by mutations in the gene encoding Torsin1A (Tor1A, DYT1). Torsins are ER-resident AAA+-ATPases implicated in lipid metabolism, nuclear pore complex (NPC) biogenesis, and lipoprotein secretion, yet their molecular function that underlies the disease pathology has remained incompletely understood. Here, we have utilized Drosophila melanogaster and human somatic cells as experimental models to shed light on their mode-of-action. Fly germ cells lacking dTorsin are arrested in development and display defects in the final steps of NPC biogenesis due to a failure in fusion of the inner and outer nuclear membranes. Using proximity labelling of Torsin1A in human cells, we identify the conserved membrane protein chloride channel CLIC-like protein 1 (CLCC1) as a novel Torsin binding partner. Absence of human CLCC1 or its Drosophila homolog dClcc1 phenocopied the membrane fusion defects at NPC assembly sites observed upon Torsin deletion. Furthermore, CLCC1 is enriched at arrested fusion sites, suggesting it to be a candidate for the elusive NE membrane fusogen. Importantly, CLCC1/dClcc1 overexpression is sufficient to rescue NPC biogenesis and developmental defects associated with Torsin-loss-of-function. Taken together, our data suggest that Torsin-regulated CLCC1 activity drives membrane fusion during NPC biogenesis and reveal that modulating CLCC1 expression is a promising therapeutic prospect for DYT1 dystonia.

Related papers

How the QED Score works

QED Score is a validated AI-based quality metric that evaluates life science papers on two dimensions: originality and validity. Each manuscript is anonymized, broken down into its claims and supporting evidence, and examined by specialized AI agents for statistical rigor, consistency across figures, and fit with the existing literature. Scores are percentile ranks, so they're comparable across fields. In blinded tests, expert professors sided with QED Score over journal rank in 75% of decisive cases.
Read the methodology

Free access for academic researchers

Create your free QED account to validate your research, strengthen grant proposals, and uncover scientific insights.
We've sent you an access link.
Please check your inbox.

Didn't get your email? Check your spam folder or reach out to info@qedscience.com

Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Looking for QED for pharma, biotech or life science organizations?