Home
 /
Papers
 /
Biochemistry
 /
Chiral methionine oxidation reagents reveal stereospecific proteome modifications
Preprint
Open access
V1
Top 1% · Validated by QED

Chiral methionine oxidation reagents reveal stereospecific proteome modifications

Angel Gonzalez-Valero, Annika C. S. Page, Jayde M. Bertoch +17 more
March 2026
 ·
bioRxiv
 ·
DOI 
10.64898/2026.03.24.713977
94
%
Reproducible
QED Impressions
This paper passed independent validation.
QED's automated review checked the evidence supporting each claim, the statistical methods, and whether the results are reproducible from the data provided.

It ranks in the top 1% of preprints assessed in Biochemistry this quarter.
Run full QED analysis
Read paper
Save

Why this is interesting

By delivering a chemoproteomic platform mapping stereospecific methionine oxidation proteome-wide, this work establishes chirality as a regulatory axis in redox biology, where a single-atom difference allosterically controls protein function and amplifies proteome-wide biochemical damage.

QED claims analysis

Summary

Enantiomeric oxaziridine probes systematically reveal that privileged methionine residues undergo stereospecific oxidation to (S)- or (R)-methionine sulfoxide across proteomes, with structural preferences for alpha helices versus beta sheets respectively, and demonstrate that (R)-methionine sulfoxide formation at BPHL M69 allosterically inhibits enzyme activity through an MsrB2-regulated pathway that controls cellular protein N-homocysteinylation levels and downstream metabolic processes.

See full analysis
Main Claim 1 –

ChURRO enantioprobes map prochiral methionine oxidation across proteomes

Supporting evidence

  • MsrA/MsrB rescue validates ChURRO stereospecific (S)/(R)-MetO mapping
Main Claim 2 –

Mitochondria harbor 60 enriched prochiral methionine oxidation sites

Supporting evidence

  • Percoll gradient centrifugation improves mitochondrial purity for profiling
  • Pro-(R) sites favor alpha helices; pro-(S) favor beta sheets
  • Mitochondrial prochiral Met sites are pathogenicity-enriched in biosynthesis
Main Claim 3 –

(R)-MetO at BPHL M69 allosterically inhibits enzyme activity

Supporting evidence

  • (R)-ChURRO-2 preferentially inhibits BPHL versus (S)-ChURRO-2
  • (R)-MetO at BPHL M69 is detected and reduced by MsrB2
Main Claim 4 –

MsrB2–BPHL stereospecific methionine redox controls N-homocysteinylation

Supporting evidence

  • Oxidative stress drives MsrB2–BPHL co-precipitation via M69
  • Elevated (R)-MetO increases N-homocysteinylation of targets including SOD1 K76
  • SOD1 K76 N-homocysteinylation site-specifically reduces SOD1 activity

Abstract

Life is predicated on chirality, a molecular asymmetry akin to the left and right versions of human hands. Here we show that privileged protein residues are predisposed for chiral regulation. We developed enantiomeric oxaziridine reagents that systematically identify pro-(S) and pro-(R) methionine oxidation sites across proteomes that can be erased by stereospecific methionine sulfoxide reductase enzymes A and B, respectively. These probes reveal that chiral regulation of methionine oxidation-reduction processes can allosterically regulate protein function, as shown in cell and murine models of oxidative stress where selective (R)-methionine sulfoxide formation on M69 of biphenyl hydrolase-like protein leads to hydrolase inhibition and amplification of proteome N-homocysteinylation modifications. This work introduces a platform for characterizing sites of asymmetric methionine oxidation and the functional consequences concomitant with an individual chiral single-atom modification.

Related papers

How the QED Score works

QED Score is a validated AI-based quality metric that evaluates life science papers on two dimensions: originality and validity. Each manuscript is anonymized, broken down into its claims and supporting evidence, and examined by specialized AI agents for statistical rigor, consistency across figures, and fit with the existing literature. Scores are percentile ranks, so they're comparable across fields. In blinded tests, expert professors sided with QED Score over journal rank in 75% of decisive cases.
Read the methodology

Free access for academic researchers

Create your free QED account to validate your research, strengthen grant proposals, and uncover scientific insights.
We've sent you an access link.
Please check your inbox.

Didn't get your email? Check your spam folder or reach out to info@qedscience.com

Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Looking for QED for pharma, biotech or life science organizations?