Home
 /
Papers
 /
Biochemistry
 /
A Chemoproteomic Atlas of the Human Purine Interactome for Regioselective Ligand Discovery
Preprint
Open access
V1
Top 1% · Validated by QED

A Chemoproteomic Atlas of the Human Purine Interactome for Regioselective Ligand Discovery

Zhihong Li, Hsiao-Kuei Tsai, Adam H. Libby +9 more
October 2025
 ·
bioRxiv
 ·
DOI 
10.1101/2025.10.21.683656
94
%
Reproducible
QED Impressions
This paper passed independent validation.
QED's automated review checked the evidence supporting each claim, the statistical methods, and whether the results are reproducible from the data provided.

It ranks in the top 1% of preprints assessed in Biochemistry this quarter.
Run full QED analysis
Read paper
Save

Why this is interesting

By charting 31,000+ targetable tyrosine and lysine sites and introducing regioselective purine chemistry, SuPUR overturns cysteine's dominance in covalent chemoproteomics, unlocking proteome-wide selective inhibitors and previously inaccessible drug targets across cancer metabolism and beyond.

QED claims analysis

Summary

Sulfonyl-purine (SuPUR) chemoproteomics enables regioselective targeting of the human purine interactome, capturing 31,000+ ligandable tyrosine and lysine sites that can be rapidly developed into potent, proteome-wide selective inhibitors through fragment-based approaches, with demonstrated applications including non-catalytic serine hydrolase inhibition, dual catalytic/PPI disruption of multifunctional enzymes, and phenotypic discovery of ACAT2 as a metabolic dependency in cancer cells.

See full analysis
Main Claim 1 –

SuPUR probes purine-dependently label tyrosine/lysine with N7/N9 regioselectivity

Supporting evidence

  • N7 vs N9 SuPUR probes show distinct overlapping binding profiles
  • SuPUR ligands inhibit diverse enzymes, including serine hydrolases and dehydrogenases
  • SuPUR ligand achieves PARP2-selective inhibition despite conserved active-site binding
Main Claim 2 –

SuPUR maps 31,000+ ligandable tyrosine/lysine sites across 4,300 proteins

Supporting evidence

  • SuPUR interactome enables phenotypic screening to identify ACAT2 cancer dependency
Main Claim 3 –

Fragment optimization yields potent, proteome-selective inhibitors via noncatalytic targeting

Main Claim 4 –

Regioselective SuPUR ligands disrupt catalytic activity and protein–protein interactions

Supporting evidence

  • ACAT2 inhibition shows strict N7-regioselective SuPUR binding-activity correlation
  • Structures show N7-purine water-bridge underlies regioselective SuPUR binding

Abstract

Purines are essential bioactive molecules that interact with a large fraction of the human proteome. Despite their importance, the scope of actionable purine-binding pockets for ligand discovery remains limited. Here, we developed a quantitative chemoproteomics platform using sulfonyl-purine (SuPUR) chemistry to produce a massive and functional map of the human purine interactome. The SuPUR platform captured 31,000+ targetable tyrosine and lysine sites, representing the most comprehensive beyond cysteine chemoproteomics database for enabling protein ligand discovery. SuPUR ligands that bind through a regioselective fashion serve as enabling starting points for developing potent (nanomolar) and proteome-wide-selective modulators of enzymatic and protein-protein interaction function. Phenotypic screening identified a site-specific (Y237) and regioselective SuPUR ligand of ACAT2 to reveal an unexpected metabolic dependency in cancer cells. A crystal structure of SuPUR ligand-bound ACAT2 revealed the purine group binds deep in the CoA pocket forming key interactions with catalytic residues via a water bridge to guide future structure-based ligand design.

Related papers

How the QED Score works

QED Score is a validated AI-based quality metric that evaluates life science papers on two dimensions: originality and validity. Each manuscript is anonymized, broken down into its claims and supporting evidence, and examined by specialized AI agents for statistical rigor, consistency across figures, and fit with the existing literature. Scores are percentile ranks, so they're comparable across fields. In blinded tests, expert professors sided with QED Score over journal rank in 75% of decisive cases.
Read the methodology

Free access for academic researchers

Create your free QED account to validate your research, strengthen grant proposals, and uncover scientific insights.
We've sent you an access link.
Please check your inbox.

Didn't get your email? Check your spam folder or reach out to info@qedscience.com

Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Looking for QED for pharma, biotech or life science organizations?