Home
 /
Papers
 /
Biophysics
 /
Emergence of specific binding and catalysis from a designed generalist binding protein
Preprint
Open access
V1
Top 1% · Validated by QED

Emergence of specific binding and catalysis from a designed generalist binding protein

Yuda Chen, Sagar Bhattacharya, Lena Bergmann +11 more
July 2025
 ·
bioRxiv
 ·
DOI 
10.1101/2025.01.30.635804
94
%
Reproducible
QED Impressions
This paper passed independent validation.
QED's automated review checked the evidence supporting each claim, the statistical methods, and whether the results are reproducible from the data provided.

It ranks in the top 1% of preprints assessed in Biophysics this quarter.
Run full QED analysis
Read paper
Save

Why this is interesting

By revealing that de novo proteins harbor natural-like binding promiscuity, this work overturns the assumption that designed scaffolds are narrow specialists, unlocking a generalizable strategy to evolve record-breaking catalysts and selective binders from scratch.

QED claims analysis

Summary

The de novo designed protein ABLE exhibits promiscuous binding to diverse small molecules comparable to natural proteins, and this generalist binding capability can be computationally evolved into highly specialized functions including a specific fluorophore-binding protein (KD = 27.8 μM) and a Kemp eliminase with near-diffusion-limited catalytic efficiency (kcat/KM = 2,200,000 M⁻¹s⁻¹), demonstrating that simultaneous exploration of protein sequence space and chemical structure space enables the emergence of new binding and catalytic functions in designed proteins through mechanisms analogous to natural protein evolution.

See full analysis
Main Claim 1 –

De novo ABLE shows natural-protein-like promiscuous fragment binding

Supporting evidence

  • Pre-existing ABLE conformational flexibility enables promiscuous ligand binding
  • Helical bundles are privileged scaffolds for diverse ligand recognition
Main Claim 2 –

Fragment-guided computation evolves ABLE into specific fluorophore binder

Supporting evidence

  • FABLE binds only a narrow subset of tested fluorophores
Main Claim 3 –

Fragment-guided evolution yields diffusion-limit-approaching Kemp eliminase

Supporting evidence

  • Saturation mutagenesis boosts KABLE catalytic efficiency by 150-fold
  • NMR-guided evolution improves KABLE beyond active-site mutagenesis
  • KABLE2.5 outperforms previously best Kemp eliminase HG3.17
  • Crystal structures validate the designed KABLE Asp-triad mechanism
  • Beneficial mutations rigidify KABLE active site and reduce hydration

Abstract

The evolution of binding and catalysis played a central role in the emergence of life. While natural proteins have finely tuned affinities for their primary ligands, they also bind weakly and promiscuously to other molecules, which serve as starting points for stepwise, incremental evolution of entirely new specificities. Thus, modern proteins emerged from the joint exploration of sequence and structural space. The ability of natural proteins to bind small molecule fragments in well-defined geometries has been widely evaluated using methods including crystallographic fragment screening. However, this approach had not been applied to de novo proteins. Here, we apply this method to explore the binding specificity of a de novo small molecule-binding protein ABLE. As in Nature, we found ABLE was capable of forming weak complexes, which were excellent starting points for designing entirely new functions, including a binder of a turn-on fluorophore and a highly efficient Kemp eliminase enzyme (kcat/KM = 2,200,000 M-1s-1) approaching the diffusion limit. This work illustrates how simultaneous consideration of both sequence and chemical structure diversity can guide the emergence of new function in designed proteins.

Related papers

How the QED Score works

QED Score is a validated AI-based quality metric that evaluates life science papers on two dimensions: originality and validity. Each manuscript is anonymized, broken down into its claims and supporting evidence, and examined by specialized AI agents for statistical rigor, consistency across figures, and fit with the existing literature. Scores are percentile ranks, so they're comparable across fields. In blinded tests, expert professors sided with QED Score over journal rank in 75% of decisive cases.
Read the methodology

Free access for academic researchers

Create your free QED account to validate your research, strengthen grant proposals, and uncover scientific insights.
We've sent you an access link.
Please check your inbox.

Didn't get your email? Check your spam folder or reach out to info@qedscience.com

Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Looking for QED for pharma, biotech or life science organizations?