Home
 /
Papers
 /
Biophysics
 /
An artificial motor protein that walks along a DNA track
Preprint
Open access
V1
Top 1% · Validated by QED

An artificial motor protein that walks along a DNA track

Patrik Nilsson, Neil O. Robertson, Nils Gustafsson +18 more
June 2025
 ·
bioRxiv
 ·
DOI 
10.1101/2025.03.07.641123
94
%
Reproducible
QED Impressions
This paper passed independent validation.
QED's automated review checked the evidence supporting each claim, the statistical methods, and whether the results are reproducible from the data provided.

It ranks in the top 1% of preprints assessed in Biophysics this quarter.
Run full QED analysis
Read paper
Save

Why this is interesting

The first artificial protein motor—built from modular, non-motor parts—proves that directional walking emerges from rational design, overturning the assumption that motor function requires evolved complexity and opening a path to programmable nanomachines.

QED claims analysis

Summary

A functional artificial protein motor can be created through modular assembly of ligand-controlled DNA-binding domains that steps directionally along DNA tracks at 1.2 nm/s with 50-100 nm processivity when externally controlled by time-dependent ligand exchange, demonstrating that motor function emerges from strategic integration of non-motor protein components with nanomolar binding specificity and optimized kinetics.

See full analysis
Main Claim 1 –

Modular assembly creates ligand-gated artificial protein motor walker

Supporting evidence

  • SpyTag/SpyCatcher covalently assembles TW with correct mass
  • SEC-SAXS shows TW ensemble of L-shaped and extended conformations
  • AFM visualizes TW binding at designed multisite DNA locations
Main Claim 2 –

Ligand-dependent cognate DNA binding by TW feet at nanomolar affinity

Supporting evidence

  • TW forms 1:1 complexes and prefers cognate DNA sites
  • Fast single-foot dissociation and stable two-foot binding enable clocking
Main Claim 3 –

TW steps directionally on DNA via time-dependent ligand exchange

Supporting evidence

  • Ligand switching synchronizes TrpR foot binding while TW stays bound
  • Dual-color FRET quantifies correct stepping and overstepping on track
  • Control experiments confirm stepping driven by ligand changes, not flow
  • Model predicts 1.2 nm/s directional motion and 50–100 nm processivity

Abstract

Molecular motors are fundamental to life because of their ability to convert chemical energy into mechanical work, an ability that is conferred by the chemical and structural complexity of their constituent proteins. Scientists have long sought to create artificial protein motors that may reveal insights into how biological motors function. While artificial molecular motors based on small molecules and DNA have been developed, creating an artificial motor protein has remained an elusive goal in synthetic biology. Here we demonstrate the realization of an artificial protein motor called Tumbleweed (TW) that walks directionally along a DNA track under external control. TW consists of three legs, each with a ligand-gated DNA-binding domain that enables selective interaction with specific sites along a DNA track. Using single-molecule fluorescence assays and a programmable microfluidic device, we show that TW steps directionally along a designed DNA track in response to a defined sequence of ligand inputs. We built our TW molecular walker using a modular approach, combining existing proteins with known properties to achieve emergent motor function, similar to how Nature evolves new proteins. Our design strategy thus offers a a platform for engineering advanced and dynamic protein functionality. Our demonstration of TW walking represents a step toward developing fully autonomous protein motors and opens new avenues for uncovering and leveraging the principles by which biological motors transduce chemical energy into motion.

Related papers

How the QED Score works

QED Score is a validated AI-based quality metric that evaluates life science papers on two dimensions: originality and validity. Each manuscript is anonymized, broken down into its claims and supporting evidence, and examined by specialized AI agents for statistical rigor, consistency across figures, and fit with the existing literature. Scores are percentile ranks, so they're comparable across fields. In blinded tests, expert professors sided with QED Score over journal rank in 75% of decisive cases.
Read the methodology

Free access for academic researchers

Create your free QED account to validate your research, strengthen grant proposals, and uncover scientific insights.
We've sent you an access link.
Please check your inbox.

Didn't get your email? Check your spam folder or reach out to info@qedscience.com

Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Looking for QED for pharma, biotech or life science organizations?