Home
 /
Papers
 /
Biophysics
 /
Molecular characterization of an adhesion GPCR signal transduction
Preprint
Open access
V1
Top 1% · Validated by QED

Molecular characterization of an adhesion GPCR signal transduction

M. Marfoglia, L. Dumas, B.S. Yang +8 more
August 2025
 ·
bioRxiv
 ·
DOI 
10.1101/2025.08.14.670383
94
%
Reproducible
QED Impressions
This paper passed independent validation.
QED's automated review checked the evidence supporting each claim, the statistical methods, and whether the results are reproducible from the data provided.

It ranks in the top 1% of preprints assessed in Biophysics this quarter.
Run full QED analysis
Read paper
Save

Why this is interesting

By revealing that the direction of applied force selects between shedding-dependent and allosteric aGPCR activation, this work resolves a decade-long mechanistic debate and enables rational engineering of mechanosensitive receptors with programmable signaling outputs.

QED claims analysis

Summary

The adhesion GPCR ADGRG1 employs a unified mechanotransduction mechanism in which the GAIN domain acts as a multi-state mechanical switch that integrates chemical and mechanical stimuli through distinct conformational pathways: constitutive and ligand-induced signaling occur through allosteric GAIN-7TM coupling with partial tethered agonist exposure, while applied mechanical forces activate the receptor through either GAIN shedding or enhanced allosteric coupling depending on force directionality, with GAIN loop dynamics and orientation determining pathway selection.

See full analysis
Main Claim 1 –

ADGRG1 GAIN Domain Shows Integrin-Like Mechanical Resistance

Main Claim 2 –

Mechanical Stress Drives GAIN into Polar or Hydrophobic Loaded States

Supporting evidence

  • AlloPool GNN Predicts Conformational Dynamics from Heterogeneous MD
  • Designed GAIN Variants Validate Predicted Loaded-State Mechanical Mechanisms
Main Claim 3 –

ADGRG1 Constitutive Signaling Arises from GAIN–7TM Allosteric Coupling

Supporting evidence

  • Collagen III Activates ADGRG1 via Conformational Selection of Active States
  • Designed GAIN Constraints Trap ADGRG1 in Signaling-Incompetent States
Main Claim 4 –

Force Direction Selects ADGRG1 Shedding versus Allosteric Activation

Supporting evidence

  • Mechanical Stimulation Differentially Enhances Signaling Across ADGRG1 GAIN Designs

Abstract

Key cellular processes rely on the transduction of extracellular mechanical signals by specialized membrane receptors, including adhesion G-protein-coupled receptors (aGPCRs). While recent studies support aGPCR activation via shedding of the extracellular GAIN domain, shedding-independent signaling mechanisms have also been observed. However, the molecular basis underlying these distinct activation modes remains poorly understood. Here, we integrate single-molecule force spectroscopy, molecular dynamics simulations, and cell-based assays to elucidate the structural and dynamic mechanisms of ADGRG1 mechanotransduction. We show that shear stress induces distinct deformation pathways in the isolated GAIN domain, promoting tethered agonist (TA) exposure through loop rearrangements prior to domain shedding. In the full-length receptor, defined GAIN orientations and specific loop contacts with the 7-transmembrane (7TM) core enable allosteric TA engagement and signaling in the absence of GAIN dissociation. The directionality of the applied force dictates the activation pathway, favoring either GAIN shedding or intact GAIN–7TM coupling. These mechanisms align with both the basal activity and collagen-enhanced signaling of ADGRG1. Using deep learning-guided design, we engineered GAIN variants with tailored mechanical sensitivity, validating our model through predictable shifts in constitutive and ligand-induced signaling. Together, our findings establish a unified framework for aGPCR activation governed by GAIN dynamics and orientation, bridging mechanical and allosteric models of receptor function and providing new strategies for engineering mechanosensitive receptors and precision therapeutics.

Related papers

How the QED Score works

QED Score is a validated AI-based quality metric that evaluates life science papers on two dimensions: originality and validity. Each manuscript is anonymized, broken down into its claims and supporting evidence, and examined by specialized AI agents for statistical rigor, consistency across figures, and fit with the existing literature. Scores are percentile ranks, so they're comparable across fields. In blinded tests, expert professors sided with QED Score over journal rank in 75% of decisive cases.
Read the methodology

Free access for academic researchers

Create your free QED account to validate your research, strengthen grant proposals, and uncover scientific insights.
We've sent you an access link.
Please check your inbox.

Didn't get your email? Check your spam folder or reach out to info@qedscience.com

Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Looking for QED for pharma, biotech or life science organizations?