Home
 /
Papers
 /
Biochemistry
 /
Stem cell function in vivo is supported by an alternative glycolysis endpoint
Preprint
Open access
V1
Top 1% · Validated by QED

Stem cell function in vivo is supported by an alternative glycolysis endpoint

Edward O. Kwarteng, Yafeng Li, Dieu Linh Nguyen +1 more
April 2026
 ·
bioRxiv
 ·
DOI 
10.64898/2026.03.30.715412
94
%
Reproducible
QED Impressions
This paper passed independent validation.
QED's automated review checked the evidence supporting each claim, the statistical methods, and whether the results are reproducible from the data provided.

It ranks in the top 1% of preprints assessed in Biochemistry this quarter.
Run full QED analysis
Read paper
Save

Why this is interesting

By proving that hematopoietic stem cells function without fermentation or oxidation, this work overturns a century-old metabolic dogma and establishes pyruvate export as a third, sufficient glycolytic endpoint in vivo.

QED claims analysis

Summary

Hematopoietic stem cells can survive and function without either fermentation or oxidation of glucose by terminating glycolysis through pyruvate export via MCT1, establishing that the classical dichotomy between oxidation and fermentation is not obligatory in vivo and that a primary function of glycolysis termination is pyruvate disposal rather than lactate or acetyl-CoA production.

See full analysis
Main Claim 1 –

LDH-Mediated Fermentation Is Dispensable for HSC Function

Supporting evidence

  • LDH-Deficient HSCs Retain Competitive Transplant Reconstitution Capacity
  • LDH Loss Preserves Glycolysis and Oxidative Metabolism in HSPCs
Main Claim 2 –

HSCs Function Without Glucose Fermentation or PDH Oxidation

Supporting evidence

  • LDH/PDH-Deficient HSCs Maintain Regenerative Transplant Capacity
Main Claim 3 –

HSCs Terminate Glycolysis via Pyruvate Export

Supporting evidence

  • MCT1-Dependent Pyruvate Export Supports HSCs Without LDH/PDH
  • Nutrient Availability Induces Physiologic Pyruvate Export by HSCs

Abstract

Carbohydrates are classically catabolized by fermentation or oxidation, a choice that impacts many cellular functions including proliferation. Proliferating cells including somatic stem and progenitor cells are thought to favor fermentation over oxidation, and most proliferating cells in vitro depend on lactate production. However, it has not been tested if fermentation and oxidation are the universal obligatory terminal fates for carbohydrates in vivo because the key enzymes, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and pyruvate dehydrogenase (PDH), have not been simultaneously deleted in any cell type. Here we show that both fermentation and oxidation are dispensable for the survival and function of hematopoietic stem cells (HSC). Combined LDHA and LDHB deletion to ablate LDH did not impair HSC function, suggesting that HSCs and rapidly proliferating hematopoietic progenitors surprisingly do not require fermentation. Combined LDHA, LDHB, and PDH deletion abolished both glucose oxidation and fermentation, but did not impair HSC function. Glycolysis was preserved, suggesting the operation of an alternative endpoint. LDH/PDH-deficient HSCs terminated glycolysis through pyruvate export. Pyruvate export by HSCs and progenitors was a physiological response to changing nutrient levels. Quadruple deletion of LDHA/B, PDH, and the pyruvate transporter MCT1 impaired HSC function. This suggested that an essential role of glycolysis termination is not to produce acetyl-CoA or lactate but to remove pyruvate. Therefore, in contrast to classical theories and to in vitro metabolism, carbohydrate metabolism in vivo does not require oxidation or fermentation but can terminate directly in pyruvate export, and this alternative pathway is sufficient to support stem cell function.

Related papers

How the QED Score works

QED Score is a validated AI-based quality metric that evaluates life science papers on two dimensions: originality and validity. Each manuscript is anonymized, broken down into its claims and supporting evidence, and examined by specialized AI agents for statistical rigor, consistency across figures, and fit with the existing literature. Scores are percentile ranks, so they're comparable across fields. In blinded tests, expert professors sided with QED Score over journal rank in 75% of decisive cases.
Read the methodology

Free access for academic researchers

Create your free QED account to validate your research, strengthen grant proposals, and uncover scientific insights.
We've sent you an access link.
Please check your inbox.

Didn't get your email? Check your spam folder or reach out to info@qedscience.com

Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Looking for QED for pharma, biotech or life science organizations?