Home
 /
Papers
 /
Biochemistry
 /
The Wnt/APC destruction complex targets SREBP2 in a β-catenin-independent pathway to control cholesterol metabolism
Preprint
Open access
V1
Top 1% · Validated by QED

The Wnt/APC destruction complex targets SREBP2 in a β-catenin-independent pathway to control cholesterol metabolism

Ahmed Rattani, Cora Anderson, William V. Trim +7 more
November 2025
 ·
bioRxiv
 ·
DOI 
10.1101/2025.10.12.681896
94
%
Reproducible
QED Impressions
This paper passed independent validation.
QED's automated review checked the evidence supporting each claim, the statistical methods, and whether the results are reproducible from the data provided.

It ranks in the top 1% of preprints assessed in Biochemistry this quarter.
Run full QED analysis
Read paper
Save

Why this is interesting

By revealing SREBP2 as a direct APC–AXIN1 destruction-complex substrate independent of β-catenin, this paper overturns decades of Wnt biology dogma and explains why cancer-driving APC truncations specifically eliminate metabolic—not just transcriptional—tumor suppression.

QED claims analysis

Summary

The Wnt destruction complex scaffold proteins APC and AXIN1 directly target SREBP2, the master regulator of cholesterol biosynthesis, for FBXW7-mediated degradation through a β-catenin-independent, GSK3β/CK1α-independent mechanism that requires phosphorylation of a conserved phosphodegron, and cancer-associated APC truncations that retain partial β-catenin-degrading activity completely abolish SREBP2 regulation, thereby linking loss of APC tumor suppressor function to dysregulated cholesterol metabolism in colorectal cancer.

See full analysis
Main Claim 1 –

APC–AXIN1 Destruction Complex Directly Targets SREBP2

Supporting evidence

  • Lysate Assay Recapitulates APC-Dependent β-Catenin Degradation
  • Lysate System Preserves Canonical β-Catenin Degradation Requirements
  • APC Controls SREBP2 Stability Independently of β-Catenin in Cells
  • APC Promotes Conserved, Post-Translational SREBP2 Degradation
  • Apc Deletion Increases SREBP2 Levels in Mouse Colon Epithelium
Main Claim 2 –

APC Loss Elevates SREBP2 Targets and Cholesterol Synthesis

Supporting evidence

  • APC Loss Increases Total Cholesterol and De Novo Synthesis
Main Claim 3 –

Wnt Ligands Stabilize SREBP2 via APC, Not β-Catenin

Main Claim 4 –

APC Degrades SREBP2 via FBXW7 Phosphodegron Phosphorylation

Supporting evidence

  • SREBP2 Turnover Is Independent of GSK3β and CK1α

Abstract

APC, the core scaffold of the Wnt destruction complex, targets the transcriptional co-activator β-catenin for proteolysis. There is no convincing evidence that APC directs degradation of other substrates. Using a reconstituted cytosolic extract-based system and complementary in vivo and cellular assays, we show that SREBP2, the master regulator of cholesterol biosynthesis, is a direct APC–AXIN1 substrate. APC-dependent SREBP2 degradation is conserved in Xenopus embryos, mouse colon, and human colorectal cancer cells and restricts SREBP2 target-gene expression, cholesterol synthesis, and tissue cholesterol levels. Mechanistically, APC and AXIN1 promote SREBP2 degradation via a conserved phosphodegron, which marks SREBP2 for ubiquitination by the E3 enzyme, FBXW7. Like β-catenin, SREBP2 is stabilized by extracellular Wnt ligands; unlike β-catenin, its regulation is independent of GSK3β and CK1α and requires the entire APC mutational cluster region (MCR), whereas β-catenin turnover can operate with only a partial MCR. These findings define a β-catenin-independent branch of Wnt signaling that couples APC to sterol metabolism, providing a mechanistic rationale to target the mevalonate/SREBP2 axis in APC-mutant colorectal cancer.

Related papers

How the QED Score works

QED Score is a validated AI-based quality metric that evaluates life science papers on two dimensions: originality and validity. Each manuscript is anonymized, broken down into its claims and supporting evidence, and examined by specialized AI agents for statistical rigor, consistency across figures, and fit with the existing literature. Scores are percentile ranks, so they're comparable across fields. In blinded tests, expert professors sided with QED Score over journal rank in 75% of decisive cases.
Read the methodology

Free access for academic researchers

Create your free QED account to validate your research, strengthen grant proposals, and uncover scientific insights.
We've sent you an access link.
Please check your inbox.

Didn't get your email? Check your spam folder or reach out to info@qedscience.com

Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Looking for QED for pharma, biotech or life science organizations?