Home
 /
Papers
 /
Biophysics
 /
Single-cell imaging reveals spontaneous phenotypic sorting and bet-hedging in developing biofilms
Preprint
Open access
V1
Top 1% · Validated by QED

Single-cell imaging reveals spontaneous phenotypic sorting and bet-hedging in developing biofilms

Jung-Shen Benny Tai, Kee-Myoung Nam, Changhao Li +4 more
June 2025
 ·
bioRxiv
 ·
DOI 
10.1101/2025.06.03.657734
94
%
Reproducible
QED Impressions
This paper passed independent validation.
QED's automated review checked the evidence supporting each claim, the statistical methods, and whether the results are reproducible from the data provided.

It ranks in the top 1% of preprints assessed in Biophysics this quarter.
Run full QED analysis
Read paper
Save

Why this is interesting

Discovering that differential drag—not active motility—spatially sorts high- and low-c-di-GMP cells in developing biofilms, this study overturns the classical dispersal lifecycle and reveals continuous planktonic shedding as an embedded bet-hedging strategy.

QED claims analysis

Summary

Spontaneous phenotypic heterogeneity in c-di-GMP signaling within developing Vibrio cholerae biofilms generates a spatially sorted pattern through differential drag mechanisms, wherein high-c-di-GMP cells experience greater matrix-mediated friction and remain in the biofilm core while low-c-di-GMP cells are preferentially transported to the periphery and continuously shed as planktonic cells, thereby enabling bet-hedging that enhances fitness in fluctuating environments.

See full analysis
Main Claim 1 –

Bimodal c-di-GMP Levels Spontaneously Spatially Sort in Biofilms

Supporting evidence

  • c-di-GMP Heterogeneity Correlates with Matrix Gene Expression and Localization
  • Quorum Sensing Creates Central c-di-GMP Dip Modulating Sorting
  • Nutrient Limitation Globally Lowers c-di-GMP in Late Biofilm Development
Main Claim 2 –

Differential Drag Drives Sorting of c-di-GMP Phenotypes During Expansion

Supporting evidence

  • Differential Cell-Surface Friction Generates c-di-GMP Phenotypic Sorting
  • Differential Cell-Cell Adhesion Viscosity Produces 3D Phenotypic Sorting
Main Claim 3 –

Lineage c-di-GMP Fluctuations Determine Cell Trajectories and Positional Fates

Supporting evidence

  • Irreversible c-di-GMP Switching Causally Redirects Cells to Biofilm Periphery
  • c-di-GMP Switching Exhibits Stochastic Two-State Kinetics with Defined Lifetimes
Main Claim 4 –

Peripheral Low c-di-GMP Cells Continuously Shed as Planktonic Cells

Abstract

How phenotypic heterogeneity shapes biofilm architecture and development remains poorly understood. Motivated by this, we developed imaging tools to track intracellular levels of c-di-GMP, a key second messenger that controls the motile-to-sessile transition, in developing Vibrio cholerae biofilms at single-cell resolution. We show that c-di-GMP levels spontaneously bifurcate into a bimodal distribution that forms a spatially sorted pattern: High-c-di-GMP cells dominate the biofilm core while low-c-di-GMP cells localize to the periphery. Combining single-lineage tracing, mutant analysis, and agent-based modeling, we reveal that this pattern arises from differential viscosity and surface friction mediated by matrix-dependent interactions between cells and their microenvironments. We demonstrate that this heterogeneity and phenotypic sorting enable continuous emergence and shedding of planktonic cells, enhancing fitness in fluctuating environments. Our findings uncover a differential drag mechanism for pattern formation in multicellular systems, and expand the classical picture of biofilm lifecycle by highlighting the functional significance of phenotypic heterogeneity.

Related papers

How the QED Score works

QED Score is a validated AI-based quality metric that evaluates life science papers on two dimensions: originality and validity. Each manuscript is anonymized, broken down into its claims and supporting evidence, and examined by specialized AI agents for statistical rigor, consistency across figures, and fit with the existing literature. Scores are percentile ranks, so they're comparable across fields. In blinded tests, expert professors sided with QED Score over journal rank in 75% of decisive cases.
Read the methodology

Free access for academic researchers

Create your free QED account to validate your research, strengthen grant proposals, and uncover scientific insights.
We've sent you an access link.
Please check your inbox.

Didn't get your email? Check your spam folder or reach out to info@qedscience.com

Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Looking for QED for pharma, biotech or life science organizations?