Home
 /
Papers
 /
Cell Biology
 /
Shape2Fate: a morphology-aware deep learning framework for tracking endocytic and exocytic carriers at nanoscale
Preprint
Open access
V1
Top 1% · Validated by QED

Shape2Fate: a morphology-aware deep learning framework for tracking endocytic and exocytic carriers at nanoscale

Adam Harmanec, Alexander D. Dagg, Jan Kamenicky +12 more
March 2026
 ·
bioRxiv
 ·
DOI 
10.64898/2026.03.29.715120
94
%
Reproducible
QED Impressions
This paper passed independent validation.
QED's automated review checked the evidence supporting each claim, the statistical methods, and whether the results are reproducible from the data provided.

It ranks in the top 1% of preprints assessed in Cell Biology this quarter.
Run full QED analysis
Read paper
Save

Why this is interesting

Shape2Fate overturns the assumption that exo-endocytic coupling follows universal spatial rules, revealing pathway-specific architectures and delivering an open morphology-aware pipeline that makes single-carrier mechanistic dissection of membrane homeostasis tractable across biology.

QED claims analysis

Summary

Shape2Fate, a morphology-aware deep learning framework trained on synthetic data, achieves expert-level tracking and outcome classification of membrane trafficking carriers at nanoscale resolution by exploiting carrier shape evolution rather than fluorescence intensity, revealing that exo-endocytic coupling architectures are pathway-specific: synchronized constitutive secretion triggers local de novo clathrin-coated pit formation near fusion sites while globally redistributing endocytic capacity, whereas insulin-stimulated GLUT4 vesicles employ an inverted coupling hierarchy by targeting pre-existing clathrin-coated pits for rapid cargo capture.

See full analysis
Main Claim 1 –

Shape2Fate Uses Shape Evolution for Expert-Level Carrier Tracking

Supporting evidence

  • Shape Index Quantifies CCP Disk-to-Annulus Transitions Without Reporters
  • Dynamin-2 Recruitment Validates Shape Index Productivity Classification
  • Shape2Fate Matches Human Experts and Outperforms TIRF Trackers
  • Shape2Fate Tracks Exocytosis via Binary Shape and Fusion Classifier
  • TIRF-SIM Resolves Carrier Morphology at ~100 nm Lateral Resolution
  • Shape2Fate Outperforms Exocytosis Detectors While Tracking Full Lifetimes
Main Claim 2 –

Constitutive Secretion Nucleates Local CCPs and Redistributes Endocytosis

Main Claim 3 –

GLUT4 Vesicles Fuse at Pre-Existing CCPs for Rapid Capture

Main Claim 4 –

Exo-Endocytic Spatial Coupling Rules Are Pathway-Specific

Abstract

Plasma membrane homeostasis requires balanced exocytosis and endocytosis, yet their coordination at the single-event level in non-neuronal cells is unresolved. We present Shape2Fate, a morphology-aware deep-learning pipeline that detects, tracks, and classifies individual exocytic and endocytic carriers in live-cell total internal reflection fluorescence structured illumination microscopy (TIRF-SIM) movies at ∼100 nm resolution. Trained on synthetic data and exploiting carrier shape evolution rather than fluorescence intensity, Shape2Fate achieves expert-level tracking and outcome classification across diverse cell types, imaging conditions, and microscope platforms. Applying Shape2Fate to constitutive secretion and insulin-stimulated GLUT4 exocytosis in adipocytes, we uncover two opposing exo-endocytic coupling architectures: exocytic fusion locally nucleates de novo clathrin-coated pits, whereas GLUT4 vesicles target pre-existing pits for rapid cargo capture. These findings establish that the spatial rules governing exo-endocytic coordination are not universal but are pathway-specific. Shape2Fate is openly available, enabling direct event-level mechanistic dissection of exo-endocytic coordination across pathways in living cells.

Related papers

How the QED Score works

QED Score is a validated AI-based quality metric that evaluates life science papers on two dimensions: originality and validity. Each manuscript is anonymized, broken down into its claims and supporting evidence, and examined by specialized AI agents for statistical rigor, consistency across figures, and fit with the existing literature. Scores are percentile ranks, so they're comparable across fields. In blinded tests, expert professors sided with QED Score over journal rank in 75% of decisive cases.
Read the methodology

Free access for academic researchers

Create your free QED account to validate your research, strengthen grant proposals, and uncover scientific insights.
We've sent you an access link.
Please check your inbox.

Didn't get your email? Check your spam folder or reach out to info@qedscience.com

Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Looking for QED for pharma, biotech or life science organizations?