Home
 /
Papers
 /
Neuroscience
 /
Sexual dimorphism in the complete connectome of the Drosophila male central nervous system
Preprint
Open access
V1
Top 1% · Validated by QED

Sexual dimorphism in the complete connectome of the Drosophila male central nervous system

Stuart Berg, Isabella R Beckett, Marta Costa +108 more
October 2025
 ·
bioRxiv
 ·
DOI 
10.1101/2025.10.09.680999
94
%
Reproducible
QED Impressions
This paper passed independent validation.
QED's automated review checked the evidence supporting each claim, the statistical methods, and whether the results are reproducible from the data provided.

It ranks in the top 1% of preprints assessed in Neuroscience this quarter.
Run full QED analysis
Read paper
Save

Why this is interesting

The first complete male Drosophila CNS connectome, compared synapse-by-synapse to the female brain, transforms sex differences from candidate neurons into fully traceable circuits and reveals dimorphism concentrates in higher brain centers via antagonistic sensory switches.

QED claims analysis

Summary

The complete synaptic-resolution connectome of the Drosophila male central nervous system reveals that sexual dimorphism is organized hierarchically, with sex-specific and dimorphic neurons concentrated in higher integrative brain centers rather than sensory-motor periphery, and that dimorphic connectivity propagates broadly through the brain involving 18% of male neurons despite only 5% being morphologically dimorphic, through tightly coupled network modules that create specialized circuit architectures for sex-specific behaviors across visual, auditory, olfactory, and gustatory modalities.

See full analysis
Main Claim 1 –

Fully proofread male Drosophila CNS connectome with 166,691 neurons

Supporting evidence

  • Neck connective neurons bottleneck sensory-motor flow and integrate multimodally
Main Claim 2 –

Dimorphic neurons enrich higher brain centers; periphery largely isomorphic

Supporting evidence

  • Frontally biased VPNs route to dimorphic circuits forming male love spot
  • Male-specific ascending neurons link VNC song output to brain detection
  • Olfactory dimorphism arises at third-order targets of isomorphic PNs
  • Mouthpart taste drives general circuits; body taste engages dimorphic pathways
Main Claim 3 –

Dimorphic connections span 6% edges, involving 18% male neurons

Supporting evidence

  • Dimorphic neurons cluster into interconnected male-specific network communities

Abstract

Sex differences in behaviour exist across all animals, typically under strong genetic regulation. In Drosophila, fruitless/doublesex transcription factors can identify dimorphic neurons but their organisation into functional circuits remains unclear.

We present the connectome of the entire Drosophila male central nervous system. This contains 166,691 neurons spanning the brain and nerve cord, fully proofread and annotated including fruitless/doublesex expression and 11,691 types. We provide the first comprehensive comparison between male and female brain connectomes to synaptic resolution, finding 7,205 isomorphic, 114 dimorphic, 262 male-specific and 69 female-specific types.

This resource enables analysis of full sensory-to-motor circuits underlying complex behaviours and the impact of dimorphic elements. Sex-specific/dimorphic neurons are concentrated in higher brain centres while the sensory and motor periphery are largely isomorphic. Within higher centres, male-specific connections are organised into hotspots defined by male-specific neurons or arbours. Numerous circuit switches reroute sensory information to form antagonistic circuits controlling opposing behaviours.

Related papers

How the QED Score works

QED Score is a validated AI-based quality metric that evaluates life science papers on two dimensions: originality and validity. Each manuscript is anonymized, broken down into its claims and supporting evidence, and examined by specialized AI agents for statistical rigor, consistency across figures, and fit with the existing literature. Scores are percentile ranks, so they're comparable across fields. In blinded tests, expert professors sided with QED Score over journal rank in 75% of decisive cases.
Read the methodology

Free access for academic researchers

Create your free QED account to validate your research, strengthen grant proposals, and uncover scientific insights.
We've sent you an access link.
Please check your inbox.

Didn't get your email? Check your spam folder or reach out to info@qedscience.com

Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Looking for QED for pharma, biotech or life science organizations?