Home
 /
Papers
 /
Immunology
 /
RNA splicing dynamics in CD8 T cells uncovers isoforms that impact T cell-mediated cancer immunotherapy
Preprint
Open access
V1
Top 1% · Validated by QED

RNA splicing dynamics in CD8 T cells uncovers isoforms that impact T cell-mediated cancer immunotherapy

Shay Tzaban, Priyanga Appasamy, Elad Zisman +16 more
September 2025
 ·
bioRxiv
 ·
DOI 
10.1101/2025.09.07.674706
94
%
Reproducible
QED Impressions
This paper passed independent validation.
QED's automated review checked the evidence supporting each claim, the statistical methods, and whether the results are reproducible from the data provided.

It ranks in the top 1% of preprints assessed in Immunology this quarter.
Run full QED analysis
Read paper
Save

Why this is interesting

By revealing alternative splicing as a targetable immune regulatory layer and delivering SpliceSeek to functionally map it, this work expands immunotherapy beyond PD-1/CTLA-4, identifying the LRRN3-203 isoform as a potent new checkpoint.

QED claims analysis

Summary

Single-cell splicing analysis of human CD8+ T cells reveals extensive isoform diversity that regulates immune function independently of gene-level expression, and CRISPR-based perturbation of splice sites identifies therapeutically targetable isoforms including LRRN3-203, which enhances T cell effector function and antitumor immunity through increased protein translation efficiency and activation of NF-κB signaling pathways.

See full analysis
Main Claim 1 –

Single-cell splicing atlas reveals dynamic CD8+ T-cell isoform programs

Supporting evidence

  • Splicing-based pseudotime captures continuous naïve-to-exhausted CD8 differentiation
  • Exhausted CD8 T cells express receptor isoform diversity including NKG7-204
Main Claim 2 –

CRISPR splice-site editing reprograms T-cell isoforms without coding changes

Supporting evidence

  • Reference knockout screens reveal concordant effects and BSG agonism
Main Claim 3 –

SpliceSeek identifies 24 isoform perturbations boosting IFN-γ output

Supporting evidence

  • LRRN3, HAVCR2, and SEMA4F isoforms enhance cytokines and cytotoxicity
Main Claim 4 –

LRRN3-203-biased T cells improve tumor control and survival

Supporting evidence

  • Short 5′UTR LRRN3-203 increases translation and protein expression
  • LRRN3-203 predicts better cancer survival beyond T-cell infiltration
  • LRRN3-203 activates NF-κB and elevates IFN-γ, TNFα, GZMB

Abstract

Immune checkpoint blockade has transformed cancer therapy, yet many patients fail to respond, and few new targets have emerged beyond PD-1 and CTLA-4. Alternative splicing dramatically diversifies the T cell proteome, but the functional roles of most isoforms remain unknown. Here we constructed the first single-cell splicing atlas of human CD8⁺ T cells, capturing dynamic isoform programs across activation and subset differentiation. This revealed distinct splicing footprints that refine conventional transcriptomic states and highlight receptor families with isoform-level regulation. To functionally interrogate these candidates, we developed SpliceSeek, a CRISPR-based pooled screening platform that perturbs splice sites to redirect isoform usage. Using SpliceSeek, we uncovered isoform-specific immune checkpoints whose perturbation enhanced effector function and tumor control, including the LRRN3-203 isoform, which augmented cytokine secretion and antitumor immunity in mice models. Together, our results establish alternative splicing as a targetable layer of immune regulation and demonstrate the potential of isoform-focused screening to expand the landscape of cancer immunotherapy.

Related papers

How the QED Score works

QED Score is a validated AI-based quality metric that evaluates life science papers on two dimensions: originality and validity. Each manuscript is anonymized, broken down into its claims and supporting evidence, and examined by specialized AI agents for statistical rigor, consistency across figures, and fit with the existing literature. Scores are percentile ranks, so they're comparable across fields. In blinded tests, expert professors sided with QED Score over journal rank in 75% of decisive cases.
Read the methodology

Free access for academic researchers

Create your free QED account to validate your research, strengthen grant proposals, and uncover scientific insights.
We've sent you an access link.
Please check your inbox.

Didn't get your email? Check your spam folder or reach out to info@qedscience.com

Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Looking for QED for pharma, biotech or life science organizations?