Home
 /
Papers
 /
Immunology
 /
In vivo genome-wide CRISPR screens in human T cells to enhance T cell therapy for solid tumors
Preprint
Open access
V1
Top 1% · Validated by QED

In vivo genome-wide CRISPR screens in human T cells to enhance T cell therapy for solid tumors

Qi Liu, Peixin Amy Chen, Esha Urs +16 more
September 2025
 ·
bioRxiv
 ·
DOI 
10.1101/2025.09.23.678127
94
%
Reproducible
QED Impressions
This paper passed independent validation.
QED's automated review checked the evidence supporting each claim, the statistical methods, and whether the results are reproducible from the data provided.

It ranks in the top 1% of preprints assessed in Immunology this quarter.
Run full QED analysis
Read paper
Save

Why this is interesting

Genome-wide in vivo CRISPR screens in primary human T cells—previously impossible—uncover human-specific GPCR barriers to tumor infiltration and suppression, establishing a platform that transforms the engineering of T cell therapies for solid tumors.

QED claims analysis

Summary

A novel in vivo CRISPR screening platform in human T cells within tumor-bearing mice enables genome-wide discovery of genetic modifications that enhance T cell therapy for solid tumors, identifying the P2RY8-Gα13 pathway as a regulator of T cell trafficking and GNAS as a central integrator of multiple immunosuppressive signals, with GNAS knockout providing dramatic therapeutic efficacy across diverse solid tumor models and synergizing with P2RY8 knockout to simultaneously enhance infiltration and resistance to tumor microenvironment suppression.

See full analysis
Main Claim 1 –

Anti-CD3 scFv tumors enable high T-cell recovery for screens

Supporting evidence

  • Anti-CD3 scFv tumors induce TIL-like dysfunction in recovered T cells
  • Anti-CD3 scFv tumor model detects Regnase-1 knockout advantage
  • High-recovery platform enables flow-based functional sgRNA stratification
Main Claim 2 –

In vivo CRISPR screens implicate GPCRs in intratumoral T-cell abundance

Supporting evidence

  • Tumor-specific GPCR enrichment appears in vivo, not in vitro
  • Tumor screens enrich human-specific P2RY8–Gα13 trafficking pathway
Main Claim 3 –

In vivo IFN-γ screen identifies GNAS as suppressive GPCR integrator

Supporting evidence

  • In vivo IFN-γ screen reveals TME-specific regulators versus in vitro
  • GNAS knockout outperforms other IFN-γ screen hits in efficacy
  • GNAS knockout confers suppressive-ligand resistance without baseline changes
  • GNAS knockout surpasses single GPCR knockouts by integrating suppression
Main Claim 4 –

GNAS knockout T cells dramatically improve solid tumor control

Supporting evidence

  • GNAS knockout CAR T cells enhance memory and antigen-specific rejection
  • GNAS knockout increases intratumoral T-cell accumulation and reduces exhaustion
  • GNAS knockout improves CAR T efficacy in pancreatic tumor models
  • GNAS knockout boosts B7H3 CAR T efficacy and durable memory
  • GNAS knockout enhances TCR T-cell therapy against solid tumors
  • GNAS knockout maintains antitumor efficacy in immunocompetent models
  • GNAS knockout preserves cytokine dependence and antigen-specific safety

Abstract

Large-scale CRISPR screening in human T cells holds significant promise for identifying genetic modifications that can enhance cellular immunotherapy. However, many genetic regulators of T cell performance in solid tumors may not be readily revealed in vitro. In vivo screening in tumor-bearing mice offers greater physiological relevance, but has historically been limited by low intratumoral T cell recovery. Here, we developed a new model system that achieves significantly higher human T cell recovery from tumors, enabling genome-wide in vivo screens with small numbers of mice. Tumor-infiltrating T cells in this model exhibit hallmarks of dysfunction compared to matched splenic T cells, creating an ideal context for screening for genetic modifiers of T cell activity in the tumor microenvironment. Using this platform, we performed two genome-wide CRISPR knockout screens to identify genes regulating T cell intratumoral abundance and effector function (e.g., IFN-γ production). The intratumoral abundance screen uncovered the P2RY8-Gα13 GPCR signaling pathway as a negative regulator of human T cell infiltration into tumors. The effector function screen identified GNAS (Gαs), a central signaling mediator downstream of multiple GPCRs that sense different suppressive ligands, as a key regulator of T cell dysfunction in tumors. Targeted GNAS knockout rendered T cells resistant to multiple suppressive cues and significantly improved therapeutic performance across diverse solid tumor models. Moreover, combinatorial knockout of P2RY8 (trafficking) and GNAS (effector function) further enhanced overall tumor control, demonstrating that genetic modifications targeting distinct T cell phenotypes can be combined to improve therapeutic potency. This flexible and scalable in vivo screening platform can be adapted to diverse tumor models and pooled CRISPR libraries, enabling future discovery of genetic strategies that equip T cell therapies to overcome barriers imposed by solid tumors.

Related papers

How the QED Score works

QED Score is a validated AI-based quality metric that evaluates life science papers on two dimensions: originality and validity. Each manuscript is anonymized, broken down into its claims and supporting evidence, and examined by specialized AI agents for statistical rigor, consistency across figures, and fit with the existing literature. Scores are percentile ranks, so they're comparable across fields. In blinded tests, expert professors sided with QED Score over journal rank in 75% of decisive cases.
Read the methodology

Free access for academic researchers

Create your free QED account to validate your research, strengthen grant proposals, and uncover scientific insights.
We've sent you an access link.
Please check your inbox.

Didn't get your email? Check your spam folder or reach out to info@qedscience.com

Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Looking for QED for pharma, biotech or life science organizations?