Home
 /
Papers
 /
Neuroscience
 /
Memory erasure by dopamine-gated retrospective learning
Preprint
Open access
V1
Top 1% · Validated by QED

Memory erasure by dopamine-gated retrospective learning

Huijeong Jeong, Leo Zsembik, Farah Farouq +13 more
January 2026
 ·
bioRxiv
 ·
DOI 
10.64898/2026.01.17.700100
94
%
Reproducible
QED Impressions
This paper passed independent validation.
QED's automated review checked the evidence supporting each claim, the statistical methods, and whether the results are reproducible from the data provided.

It ranks in the top 1% of preprints assessed in Neuroscience this quarter.
Run full QED analysis
Read paper
Save

Why this is interesting

Inverting extinction—delivering outcomes without their cues—erases learned associations rather than merely suppressing them, overturning foundational assumptions about memory permanence and identifying mesolimbic dopamine at reward as the gate for genuine associative unlearning.

QED claims analysis

Summary

Memory erasure requires retrospective extinction—presenting outcomes without their predictive cues—which degrades cue-outcome associations through dopamine-gated learning at reward delivery, whereas standard prospective extinction merely suppresses behavior by reducing estimated outcome rate while preserving the underlying memory, with orbitofrontal cortex activity at reward enabling rapid behavioral recovery after prospective extinction.

See full analysis
Main Claim 1 –

Retrospective Extinction Erases Cue–Reward Memory, Prospective Extinction Preserves It

Supporting evidence

  • Mesolimbic Dopamine at Reward Gates Retrospective Extinction
  • Retrospective Extinction Uses Reward-Triggered Updates, Not Context Switching
  • Retrospective Extinction Generalizes Across Outcomes and Species
  • ANCCR Predicts Erasure via Degraded Retrospective Cue–Outcome Associations
  • Extinction Dopamine Dynamics Support Retrospective Learning Over RPE Models
  • Extinction Effects Often Reflect Output-Variable Changes, Not Memory Erasure
Main Claim 2 –

OFC Reward-Evoked Activity Is Required for Rapid Reacquisition

Abstract

Erasing outdated memories is crucial for adaptive behavior. Yet once a cue–outcome association is learned, repeated cue exposure without outcome suppresses conditioned behavior without erasing the underlying memory. This allows rapid behavioral recovery when outcomes are reintroduced. Here, we confirm this limitation for standard “prospective extinction” protocols that present cues without the associated outcome, but show that true memory erasure is achieved by inverting the paradigm: presenting outcomes without associated cues, i.e., “retrospective extinction”. We demonstrate that orbitofrontal cortex activity at outcome is necessary for the rapid behavioral recovery following prospective extinction, and that mesolimbic dopamine activity at outcome is necessary for retrospective extinction. These findings reconceptualize extinction mechanisms and suggest complementary strategies to mitigate relapse and erase maladaptive memories.

Related papers

How the QED Score works

QED Score is a validated AI-based quality metric that evaluates life science papers on two dimensions: originality and validity. Each manuscript is anonymized, broken down into its claims and supporting evidence, and examined by specialized AI agents for statistical rigor, consistency across figures, and fit with the existing literature. Scores are percentile ranks, so they're comparable across fields. In blinded tests, expert professors sided with QED Score over journal rank in 75% of decisive cases.
Read the methodology

Free access for academic researchers

Create your free QED account to validate your research, strengthen grant proposals, and uncover scientific insights.
We've sent you an access link.
Please check your inbox.

Didn't get your email? Check your spam folder or reach out to info@qedscience.com

Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Looking for QED for pharma, biotech or life science organizations?