Home
 /
Papers
 /
Genomics
 /
Mapping transcriptional responses to cellular perturbation dictionaries with RNA fingerprinting
Preprint
Open access
V1
Top 1% · Validated by QED

Mapping transcriptional responses to cellular perturbation dictionaries with RNA fingerprinting

Isabella N. Grabski, Junsuk Lee, John Blair +5 more
September 2025
 ·
bioRxiv
 ·
DOI 
10.1101/2025.09.19.676866
94
%
Reproducible
QED Impressions
This paper passed independent validation.
QED's automated review checked the evidence supporting each claim, the statistical methods, and whether the results are reproducible from the data provided.

It ranks in the top 1% of preprints assessed in Genomics this quarter.
Run full QED analysis
Read paper
Save

Why this is interesting

RNA fingerprinting solves a fundamental bottleneck—causally linking transcriptional states to the perturbations that generated them—scaling to genome-wide screens, resolving combinatorial effects, and revealing RPL10/RPL24 as previously unrecognized p53 regulators under ribosomal stress.

Author perspective

What is the most important insight, discovery, or finding from your paper that you would like other scientists to know?
“

A central challenge in single-cell genomics is that most data is observational, telling us how cellular states differ across conditions but not why. In this work, we introduced a statistical framework, RNA fingerprinting, that addresses this challenge by mapping single-cell experiments onto reference dictionaries of known perturbations. This allows us to infer the molecular drivers underlying a cell's transcriptional state, which we were able to apply to a diverse range of biological questions, including to identify new regulators of p53 activation, describe off-target drug effects, and characterize heterogeneous immune cell responses in the mouse lung.

”
Rahul Satija

QED claims analysis

Summary

RNA fingerprinting, a statistical framework that learns denoised perturbation signatures from single-cell reference dictionaries and probabilistically maps query cells to causal perturbations with uncertainty quantification, enables accurate perturbation assignment at genome scale, identifies context-specific regulators including RPL10 and RPL24 as novel mediators of p53 activation under ribosomal stress, reveals dose-dependent off-target effects in putatively selective drugs, and uncovers heterogeneous cytokine-driven immune responses in vivo that are undetectable by conventional analysis methods.

See full analysis
Main Claim 1 –

RNA Fingerprinting Learns Denoised Signatures and Probabilistically Assigns Perturbations

Supporting evidence

  • RNA Fingerprinting Accurately Assigns Perturbations Within and Across Cell Types
  • RNA Fingerprinting Resolves Dual Perturbations via Multiple Credible Sets
  • RNA Fingerprinting Scales to Genome-Wide Dictionaries with Specific Assignments
Main Claim 2 –

RPL10 and RPL24 Enable p53 Activation Under Ribosomal Stress

Main Claim 3 –

RNA Fingerprinting Maps Drug Treatments to True Genetic Targets

Main Claim 4 –

RNA Fingerprinting Detects In Vivo Heterogeneous Cytokine Responses Missed Conventionally

Abstract

Single-cell perturbation dictionaries provide systematic measurements of how cells respond to genetic and chemical perturbations, and create the opportunity to assign causal interpretations to observational data. Here, we introduce RNA fingerprinting, a statistical framework that maps transcriptional responses from new experiments onto reference perturbation dictionaries. RNA fingerprinting learns denoised perturbation “fingerprints” from single-cell data, then probabilisti-cally assigns query cells to one or more candidate perturbations while accounting for uncertainty. We benchmark our method across ground-truth datasets, demonstrating accurate assignments at single-cell resolution, scalability to genome-wide screens, and the ability to resolve combinatorial perturbations. We demonstrate its broad utility across diverse biological settings: identifying context-specific regulators of p53 under ribosomal stress, characterizing drug mechanisms of action and dose-dependent off-target effects, and uncovering cytokine-driven B cell heterogeneity during secondary influenza infection in vivo. Together, these results establish RNA fingerprinting as a versatile framework for interpreting single-cell datasets by linking cellular states to the underlying perturbations which generated them.

Related papers

How the QED Score works

QED Score is a validated AI-based quality metric that evaluates life science papers on two dimensions: originality and validity. Each manuscript is anonymized, broken down into its claims and supporting evidence, and examined by specialized AI agents for statistical rigor, consistency across figures, and fit with the existing literature. Scores are percentile ranks, so they're comparable across fields. In blinded tests, expert professors sided with QED Score over journal rank in 75% of decisive cases.
Read the methodology

Free access for academic researchers

Create your free QED account to validate your research, strengthen grant proposals, and uncover scientific insights.
We've sent you an access link.
Please check your inbox.

Didn't get your email? Check your spam folder or reach out to info@qedscience.com

Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Looking for QED for pharma, biotech or life science organizations?