Home
 /
Papers
 /
Biochemistry
 /
Genetic variation of human G6PD impacts Red Blood Cell transfusion efficacy
Preprint
Open access
V1
Top 1% · Validated by QED

Genetic variation of human G6PD impacts Red Blood Cell transfusion efficacy

Matthew S. Karafin, Aaron V. Issaian, Shaun Bevers +31 more
November 2025
 ·
bioRxiv
 ·
DOI 
10.1101/2025.11.21.689741
94
%
Reproducible
QED Impressions
This paper passed independent validation.
QED's automated review checked the evidence supporting each claim, the statistical methods, and whether the results are reproducible from the data provided.

It ranks in the top 1% of preprints assessed in Biochemistry this quarter.
Run full QED analysis
Read paper
Save

Why this is interesting

By proving that donor G6PD genotype reduces transfused RBC survival and impairs recipient organ oxygenation, this work overturns the assumption that donor genetics are irrelevant to transfusion efficacy, making genotype-aware inventory management a clinical imperative.

QED claims analysis

Summary

Common G6PD genetic variants, particularly the African A− (V68M/N126D) and Mediterranean (S188F) alleles, reduce red blood cell transfusion efficacy through variant-specific protein instability mechanisms—kinetic fragility for A− and thermodynamic fragility for Mediterranean—that impair pentose phosphate pathway flux, increase oxidative stress during storage, and result in 8-12% lower post-transfusion recovery with measurable reductions in hemoglobin increments and end-organ oxygenation in both animal models and sickle cell disease patients.

See full analysis
Main Claim 1 –

Common G6PD Missense Variants in Donors Associate with Storage Hemolysis

Supporting evidence

  • G6PD Variants cis-Regulate RBC G6PD Protein and Redox Metabolites
  • Recalled Donor Multi-Omics Links G6PD Genotype to Metabolic Flux Remodeling
Main Claim 2 –

Humanized G6PD Mice Reproduce Storage Lesions and PPP Flux Shifts

Main Claim 3 –

Donor G6PD Deficiency Reduces Mouse PTR and Human Hemoglobin Increment

Supporting evidence

  • G6PD-Deficient Transfusions Worsen Renal Oxygenation After Hemorrhage in Mice
Main Claim 4 –

G6PD-Deficient Units Reduce PTR and Increase Hemolysis in SCD

Supporting evidence

  • G6PD Activity Declines with RBC Age in Circulation
  • G6PD Deficient Alleles Share Protein Instability Mechanisms

Abstract

Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficiency, the most common human enzymopathy, affects 6% of the global population, yet its impact on blood storage and transfusion efficacy remains undefined. We integrated genome–metabolome–proteome analyses of 13,091 blood donors (362 G6PD SNPs), validated in a recalled cohort (n=643), linked donor–recipient databases, humanized mouse models (canonical, African A− [V68M+N126D], Mediterranean [S188F]), and a prospective sickle cell disease study. Common G6PD variants reduced protein abundance, reprogrammed redox metabolism, and increased storage hemolysis. In mice, G6PD-deficient RBCs showed lower post-transfusion recovery, higher oxidative stress, and impaired renal oxygenation. Clinically, recipients of G6PD-deficient units exhibited smaller hemoglobin increments and reduced RBC L¹Cr-survival (−8% at 24 h; −12% at 4 weeks). Structural studies revealed kinetic fragility for A− and thermodynamic fragility for Med−, linking genotype to protein instability and transfusion outcome. These findings identify donor G6PD genotype as a determinant of transfusion efficacy, supporting genotype-aware inventory-management strategies.

Related papers

How the QED Score works

QED Score is a validated AI-based quality metric that evaluates life science papers on two dimensions: originality and validity. Each manuscript is anonymized, broken down into its claims and supporting evidence, and examined by specialized AI agents for statistical rigor, consistency across figures, and fit with the existing literature. Scores are percentile ranks, so they're comparable across fields. In blinded tests, expert professors sided with QED Score over journal rank in 75% of decisive cases.
Read the methodology

Free access for academic researchers

Create your free QED account to validate your research, strengthen grant proposals, and uncover scientific insights.
We've sent you an access link.
Please check your inbox.

Didn't get your email? Check your spam folder or reach out to info@qedscience.com

Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Looking for QED for pharma, biotech or life science organizations?