Home
 /
Papers
 /
Molecular Biology
 /
Generative Design of Cell Type-Specific RNA Splicing Elements for Programmable Gene Regulation
Preprint
Open access
V1
Top 1% · Validated by QED

Generative Design of Cell Type-Specific RNA Splicing Elements for Programmable Gene Regulation

Xi Dawn Chen, Maile Jim, Mounica Vallurupalli +15 more
November 2025
 ·
bioRxiv
 ·
DOI 
10.1101/2025.11.05.686847
94
%
Reproducible
QED Impressions
This paper passed independent validation.
QED's automated review checked the evidence supporting each claim, the statistical methods, and whether the results are reproducible from the data provided.

It ranks in the top 1% of preprints assessed in Molecular Biology this quarter.
Run full QED analysis
Read paper
Save

Why this is interesting

SPICE overturns the notion that splicing regulation can only be read, not written: by pairing a 43-cell-line functional atlas with generative AI, it delivers programmable, cell-type-specific gene regulation and oncogenic splicing mutation targeting.

QED claims analysis

Summary

Integration of massively parallel splicing assays across 43 cell lines with deep learning models enables both accurate prediction of cell type-specific alternative splicing patterns and generative design of synthetic sequences with programmable splicing activity, including sequences that selectively target cancer cells harboring splicing factor mutations.

See full analysis
Main Claim 1 –

MPRA across 43 cell lines reveals cell type-specific exon skipping

Supporting evidence

  • Upsilon metric quantifies and identifies cell type-specific splicing elements
  • Cell type-specific splicing drives corresponding protein expression changes
  • RNA-binding protein motifs drive cell type-specific exon inclusion patterns
Main Claim 2 –

Soma predicts cell type-specific splicing in unseen sequences and cell types

Supporting evidence

  • Soma predicts mutagenesis effects and identifies splicing regulatory elements
Main Claim 3 –

Melange designs synthetic splicing elements with programmed PSI outcomes

Supporting evidence

  • Melange generates cell type-specific splicing sequences with targeted activity
Main Claim 4 –

SPICE designs splicing elements specific to splicing factor mutant cancers

Supporting evidence

  • Designed elements selectively splice in RBM5/RBM10 loss-of-function cells

Abstract

Programmable control of gene expression in specific cell types is essential for both basic discovery and therapeutic intervention, yet current strategies lack scalability across diverse cellular contexts. Here, we introduce SPICE (Splicing Proportions In Cell types), an integrated experimental and computational framework that harnesses alternative RNA splicing as a programmable modality for cell type-specific gene regulation. To power SPICE, we constructed a massively parallel reporter assay (MPRA) comprising 46,372 human-derived sequences and profiled exon skipping across 43 cell lines spanning 10 lineages, uncovering widespread cell type-specific exon skipping. Using this data, we trained deep learning models that both predict splicing in unseen contexts and generate synthetic sequences with programmed, cell type-specific splicing patterns. Leveraging these models, we further engineered sequences that selectively splice in cells harboring oncogenic splicing factor mutations, demonstrating translational potential. SPICE provides a generalizable strategy for dissecting splicing regulation and engineering alternative splicing as a gene expression regulatory layer for research and therapeutic applications.

We introduce SPICE, an integrated framework that couples large-scale splicing assays with generative design to uncover regulatory principles and design programmable, cell-specific gene expression for research and therapeutic applications.

Related papers

How the QED Score works

QED Score is a validated AI-based quality metric that evaluates life science papers on two dimensions: originality and validity. Each manuscript is anonymized, broken down into its claims and supporting evidence, and examined by specialized AI agents for statistical rigor, consistency across figures, and fit with the existing literature. Scores are percentile ranks, so they're comparable across fields. In blinded tests, expert professors sided with QED Score over journal rank in 75% of decisive cases.
Read the methodology

Free access for academic researchers

Create your free QED account to validate your research, strengthen grant proposals, and uncover scientific insights.
We've sent you an access link.
Please check your inbox.

Didn't get your email? Check your spam folder or reach out to info@qedscience.com

Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Looking for QED for pharma, biotech or life science organizations?