Home
 /
Papers
 /
Cell Biology
 /
Ferroptosis governs lymphatic vessel growth and regression
Preprint
Open access
V1
Top 1% · Validated by QED

Ferroptosis governs lymphatic vessel growth and regression

Maria-Kyriaki Drekolia, Daiyu Wang, Yunyun Chen +22 more
November 2025
 ·
bioRxiv
 ·
DOI 
10.1101/2025.11.18.689033
94
%
Reproducible
QED Impressions
This paper passed independent validation.
QED's automated review checked the evidence supporting each claim, the statistical methods, and whether the results are reproducible from the data provided.

It ranks in the top 1% of preprints assessed in Cell Biology this quarter.
Run full QED analysis
Read paper
Save

Why this is interesting

Establishing ferroptosis as the physiological death program sculpting lymphatic—but not blood—vessels overturns a core vascular biology assumption and, by decoding the underlying molecular logic, immediately opens tractable therapeutic targets against pathological lymphangiogenesis.

QED claims analysis

Summary

Ferroptosis serves as a physiological, cell-intrinsic mechanism that selectively governs lymphatic but not blood endothelial cell survival during development and injury-induced remodeling, driven by lymphatic-specific vulnerabilities including reduced cystine import and glutathione availability, SH3RF3-mediated GPX4 degradation, and enrichment of polyunsaturated fatty acid-containing membrane phospholipids, which can be therapeutically exploited to prevent pathological lymphangiogenesis while modulating immune responses.

See full analysis
Main Claim 1 –

Physiological ferroptosis drives lymphatic remodeling, not blood endothelium

Supporting evidence

  • Saturated fatty acids block physiological lymphatic regression via ferroptosis inhibition
  • Lymphatic endothelium has higher labile iron and oxidative stress
Main Claim 2 –

Cystine import–glutathione dependence makes lymphatic endothelium ferroptosis-prone

Supporting evidence

  • Only ferroptosis inhibitors rescue cystine-deprivation lymphatic cell death
  • Lymphatic SLC7A11 deletion causes embryonic edema and impaired lymphangiogenesis
  • Reduced persulfide generation increases lymphatic endothelial ferroptosis sensitivity
  • Mevalonate and FSP1 pathways do not explain endothelial ferroptosis differences
Main Claim 3 –

GPX4 protects lymphatic endothelium; loss triggers selective ferroptosis

Supporting evidence

  • GPX4 is required for lymphatics but dispensable for blood vessels
Main Claim 4 –

SH3RF3 ubiquitinates GPX4, lowering lymphatic GPX4 and inducing ferroptosis

Abstract

Whether, when, and how lymphatic vessels undergo cell death remains poorly understood. Here we identify ferroptosis as a physiological, cell-intrinsic regulator of the lymphatic endothelial cell survival during development and following injury, in stark contrast to the resilient organotypic blood endothelial cells. The lymphatic susceptibility to ferroptosis stems from tampered cystine/ hydropersulfide metabolism, alongside reduced glutathione availability triggered by an SH3RF3 E3 ligase mediated GPX4 degradation, and enhanced integration of polyunsaturated fatty acid enriched membrane phospholipids. Inducing ferroptosis genetically or pharmacologically elevated lymphatic lipid peroxidation, halted embryonic lymphangiogenesis and prevented post-injury lymphatic overgrowth while simultaneously shaped immune responses. Conversely, ferroptosis inhibition through saturated fatty acid supplementation led to pathological lymphatic hyperplasia. Targeting lymphatic ferroptotic mechanisms holds promise against pathological lymphatic growth in response to injury.

Related papers

How the QED Score works

QED Score is a validated AI-based quality metric that evaluates life science papers on two dimensions: originality and validity. Each manuscript is anonymized, broken down into its claims and supporting evidence, and examined by specialized AI agents for statistical rigor, consistency across figures, and fit with the existing literature. Scores are percentile ranks, so they're comparable across fields. In blinded tests, expert professors sided with QED Score over journal rank in 75% of decisive cases.
Read the methodology

Free access for academic researchers

Create your free QED account to validate your research, strengthen grant proposals, and uncover scientific insights.
We've sent you an access link.
Please check your inbox.

Didn't get your email? Check your spam folder or reach out to info@qedscience.com

Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Looking for QED for pharma, biotech or life science organizations?