Home
 /
Papers
 /
Developmental Biology
 /
Buckling instability underlies vertebral segmentation during axolotl tail regeneration
Preprint
Open access
V1
Top 1% · Validated by QED

Buckling instability underlies vertebral segmentation during axolotl tail regeneration

Wouter Masselink, Tobias Gerber, Vijayishwer Singh Jamwal +23 more
January 2026
 ·
bioRxiv
 ·
DOI 
10.1101/2024.01.31.577464
94
%
Reproducible
QED Impressions
This paper passed independent validation.
QED's automated review checked the evidence supporting each claim, the statistical methods, and whether the results are reproducible from the data provided.

It ranks in the top 1% of preprints assessed in Developmental Biology this quarter.
Run full QED analysis
Read paper
Save

Why this is interesting

Axolotl vertebrae regenerate through compression-induced buckling of a cartilage rod—independent of the somitic clock—overturning the assumption that regeneration recapitulates embryonic patterning and establishing mechanics as a scalable driver of axial segmentation.

Author perspective

What is the most important insight, discovery, or finding from your paper that you would like other scientists to know?
“

Axolotl tail regeneration proceeds through fundamentally different processes compared to embryonic development, both at the level of cellular identity and patterning mechanisms.

”
Wouter Masselink
&
Prayag Murawala

QED claims analysis

Summary

Axolotl tail regeneration employs a mechanism of vertebral segmentation fundamentally distinct from embryonic somitogenesis, whereby Lfng+ multipotent connective tissue progenitors located at intermyotomal boundaries give rise to somitic mesodermal lineages independently of the somitic clock gene Hes7, and vertebral patterning emerges through compression-induced buckling instability of the regenerating cartilage rod rather than through molecular prepatterns, providing a scalable mechanical mechanism for large-scale axial regeneration.

See full analysis
Main Claim 1 –

Tail blastema regeneration lacks histologically distinct somites

Supporting evidence

  • Somite-dependent resegmentation is absent during tail regeneration
  • Somitic clock and resegmentation genes absent in tail blastema
Main Claim 2 –

Hes7 required in embryos but dispensable in regeneration

Main Claim 3 –

Intermyotomal Lfng+ progenitors generate regenerated somitic lineages

Supporting evidence

  • Clonal barcoding links myogenic cells to other somitic derivatives
  • Existing vertebrae minimally contribute cells to tail regeneration
  • Lfng/Meox1/Scx+ tenocytes are DMS-progenitor source cells
  • Lfng+ lineage tracing shows contribution to all somitic lineages
  • Ablating Lfng+ DMS-progenitors blocks complete tail outgrowth
  • DMS-progenitors maintain non-embryonic identity during regeneration
Main Claim 4 –

Cartilage rod buckling drives vertebral segmentation during regeneration

Supporting evidence

  • Cartilage rod mechanics: soft core and stiffer shell
  • Vertebral wavelength scales with radius as buckling model predicts
  • BAPN mechanical perturbation shifts vertebral segmentation as predicted
  • High-dose BAPN induces global rod buckling, indicating compression

Abstract

Primary body-axis development is a highly conserved process that proceeds through somitogenesis and subsequent subdivision into dermatome, myotome, and sclerotome. Defects in somitic-clock genes such as Hes7 lead to vertebral-segmentation defects in mice and fish. Here we show that in the axolotl, although Hes7 is necessary for proper embryonic vertebral segmentation, it is— surprisingly—dispensable during tail regeneration. We investigated the mechanism of vertebral segmentation during regeneration which initially occurs through extension of a cartilage rod ventral to the spinal cord. We find that the regenerating cartilage rod undergoes a periodic wrinkling that provides a template for vertebral segmentation. Via direct mechanical measurements and biophysical perturbations, we show that a model of compression-induced buckling instability can predict vertebral segmentation. The cartilage rod and other somitic derivatives (muscle, cartilage, tendon, fibroblasts) arise from tendon-like, Lfng+ multi-potent mesenchymal progenitors, which display a gene regulatory state distinct from somitic progenitors. In summary, we uncover a mechanism of vertebral segmentation during axolotl tail regeneration that is distinct from the somite-based developmental mechanism.

Related papers

How the QED Score works

QED Score is a validated AI-based quality metric that evaluates life science papers on two dimensions: originality and validity. Each manuscript is anonymized, broken down into its claims and supporting evidence, and examined by specialized AI agents for statistical rigor, consistency across figures, and fit with the existing literature. Scores are percentile ranks, so they're comparable across fields. In blinded tests, expert professors sided with QED Score over journal rank in 75% of decisive cases.
Read the methodology

Free access for academic researchers

Create your free QED account to validate your research, strengthen grant proposals, and uncover scientific insights.
We've sent you an access link.
Please check your inbox.

Didn't get your email? Check your spam folder or reach out to info@qedscience.com

Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Looking for QED for pharma, biotech or life science organizations?