Home
 /
Papers
 /
Cancer Biology
 /
A targetable dependency on nonsense-mediated decay for proteostasis and immune control in small cell lung cancer
Preprint
Open access
V1
Top 1% · Validated by QED

A targetable dependency on nonsense-mediated decay for proteostasis and immune control in small cell lung cancer

Lucia A. Torres Fernández, Volker Boehm, Joel Kaufmann +41 more
April 2026
 ·
bioRxiv
 ·
DOI 
10.64898/2026.03.31.715503
94
%
Reproducible
QED Impressions
This paper passed independent validation.
QED's automated review checked the evidence supporting each claim, the statistical methods, and whether the results are reproducible from the data provided.

It ranks in the top 1% of preprints assessed in Cancer Biology this quarter.
Run full QED analysis
Read paper
Save

Why this is interesting

By showing that SCLC hijacks hyperactive NMD to survive its mutational burden and evade immunity, this work reframes TMB as a precision biomarker for a dual vulnerability: proteotoxic apoptosis and restored neoantigen-driven tumor clearance.

QED claims analysis

Summary

Small cell lung cancer exhibits hyperactive nonsense-mediated decay (NMD) that correlates with tumor mutational burden, and NMD inhibition creates a dual therapeutic vulnerability by triggering TMB-dependent ER stress-mediated apoptosis in cancer cells while simultaneously upregulating neoantigen presentation to enhance T cell-mediated immune responses, thereby enabling effective tumor control in vivo and improving immunotherapy efficacy.

See full analysis
Main Claim 1 –

Hyperactive NMD in SCLC Correlates with Tumor Mutational Burden

Supporting evidence

  • Luciferase Reporters Functionally Validate NMD Activity in SCLC
Main Claim 2 –

NMD Inhibition Induces TMB-Dependent Apoptosis and Growth Arrest

Supporting evidence

  • Genetic and Pharmacologic NMD Inhibition Accumulates PTC Transcripts
  • Isogenic Murine Models Confirm TMB-Dependent NMD Inhibitor Sensitivity
  • NMD Inhibition Triggers ER Stress-Mediated Apoptosis in TMB-High Cells
Main Claim 3 –

In Vivo NMD Inhibition Controls TMB-High Tumors Without Toxicity

Supporting evidence

  • Inducible SMG1 Knockdown Confirms On-Target In Vivo NMD Effects
Main Claim 4 –

NMD Inhibition Upregulates Neoantigens and MHC-I Peptide Presentation

Supporting evidence

  • Immunopeptidomics Shows Increased Frameshift Neoantigen Presentation After NMD Blockade
  • NMD-Regulated Frameshift Neoantigens Elicit Strong Functional T Cell Responses

Abstract

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is among the deadliest cancers with excessive somatic alterations, expectedly resulting in immunogenic epitopes. However, patient benefit from immunotherapy is limited. We found abundant frameshift mutations in SCLC, regarded as highly immunogenic, counterbalanced by a hyperactive nonsense-mediated decay (NMD) pathway, responsible for frameshift-mRNA degradation. NMD activity correlated with tumor mutational burden (TMB) across cancers, suggesting that SCLC depends on NMD for cellular homeostasis and immune evasion. NMD inhibition impaired SCLC proliferation and induced ER stress-dependent apoptosis in a TMB-dependent manner, thereby enabling pharmacological inhibition in vivo which effectively controlled tumor growth. By integrating genome and transcriptome sequencing with MHC-I immunopeptidomics and functional in vitro and in vivo assays, we identified that NMD inhibition boosted neoantigen expression and presentation by tumor cells and increased T cell recognition, thus enhancing overall tumor immunogenicity and further improving immunotherapy efficacy in vivo. Our work shows that SCLC – as a TMBhigh cancer – relies on NMD for survival and immune escape, uncovering a novel TMB-dependent tractable vulnerability for this devastating disease.

Related papers

How the QED Score works

QED Score is a validated AI-based quality metric that evaluates life science papers on two dimensions: originality and validity. Each manuscript is anonymized, broken down into its claims and supporting evidence, and examined by specialized AI agents for statistical rigor, consistency across figures, and fit with the existing literature. Scores are percentile ranks, so they're comparable across fields. In blinded tests, expert professors sided with QED Score over journal rank in 75% of decisive cases.
Read the methodology

Free access for academic researchers

Create your free QED account to validate your research, strengthen grant proposals, and uncover scientific insights.
We've sent you an access link.
Please check your inbox.

Didn't get your email? Check your spam folder or reach out to info@qedscience.com

Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Looking for QED for pharma, biotech or life science organizations?