Home
 /
Papers
 /
Evolutionary Biology
 /
A protein interactome for the last eukaryotic common ancestor illuminates the biochemical basis of modern genetic diseases
Preprint
Open access
V1
Top 1% · Validated by QED

A protein interactome for the last eukaryotic common ancestor illuminates the biochemical basis of modern genetic…

Rachael M. Cox, Ophelia Papoulas, Shirlee Shril +13 more
April 2026
 ·
bioRxiv
 ·
DOI 
10.1101/2024.05.26.595818
94
%
Reproducible
QED Impressions
This paper passed independent validation.
QED's automated review checked the evidence supporting each claim, the statistical methods, and whether the results are reproducible from the data provided.

It ranks in the top 1% of preprints assessed in Evolutionary Biology this quarter.
Run full QED analysis
Read paper
Save

Why this is interesting

By reconstructing the protein interactome of our 1.5-billion-year-old eukaryotic ancestor, this work transforms deep evolutionary genomics into a functional discovery engine, predicting and experimentally validating new human disease genes for ciliopathies and bone disorders.

QED claims analysis

Summary

Reconstruction of the Last Eukaryotic Common Ancestor (LECA) protein interactome through integration of >26,000 mass spectrometry experiments across 31 species reveals 109,466 conserved protein interactions among 3,193 ancient gene families, which successfully predicts novel gene-disease associations for approximately one-third of tested Mendelian disorders and elucidates disease mechanisms including ciliary dysfunction in EFHC2-associated renal failure, ATP6V1A in osteopetrosis, and GLG1 in short-rib thoracic dysplasia.

See full analysis
Main Claim 1 –

Phylogenetic reconstructions infer 6,429–10,091 LECA gene families

Supporting evidence

  • LECA gene set supports nucleus, endomembranes, cytoskeleton, and mitochondria
Main Claim 2 –

26,000 proteomics experiments reconstruct 109,466 LECA protein interactions

Supporting evidence

  • LECA interactions cluster into 199–2,014 conserved protein complexes
  • Ancient vesicle tethering shows conservation and novel subunit interactions
  • Conserved ARP2/3 and regulators support a phagocytosing LECA
Main Claim 3 –

LECA interactome links EFHC2 to ciliary renal disease mechanisms

Supporting evidence

  • EFHC2 R133H variant disrupts ciliary axoneme localization in Xenopus
Main Claim 4 –

LECA interactome network propagation predicts genes for one-third Mendelian disorders

Supporting evidence

  • Network prediction implicates ATP6V1A in osteopetrosis, validated in mice
  • GLG1 knockdown causes cilia loss and IFT accumulation in Xenopus

Abstract

All eukaryotes share a single-celled ancestor from ∼1.5–1.8 billion years ago, the Last Eukaryotic Common Ancestor (LECA). Roughly half of gene families found in modern eukaryotes were already present in LECA, forming molecular systems that continue to influence genetic diseases and traits today. To investigate these systems, we compared genes across 156 organisms to define a core set of protein-coding gene families likely present in LECA, with a quarter remaining uncharacterized. Integrating >26,000 mass spectrometry proteomics analyses from 31 species, we inferred higher-order complexes among these ancient proteins. This reconstructed interactome reveals both established and novel assemblies, offering a biochemical snapshot of LECA’s organization. Finally, by exploring these ancient protein interactions, we found new human gene-disease associations for bone density and congenital birth defects, illustrating the value of ancestral protein networks for modern functional genetics.

Related papers

How the QED Score works

QED Score is a validated AI-based quality metric that evaluates life science papers on two dimensions: originality and validity. Each manuscript is anonymized, broken down into its claims and supporting evidence, and examined by specialized AI agents for statistical rigor, consistency across figures, and fit with the existing literature. Scores are percentile ranks, so they're comparable across fields. In blinded tests, expert professors sided with QED Score over journal rank in 75% of decisive cases.
Read the methodology

Free access for academic researchers

Create your free QED account to validate your research, strengthen grant proposals, and uncover scientific insights.
We've sent you an access link.
Please check your inbox.

Didn't get your email? Check your spam folder or reach out to info@qedscience.com

Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Looking for QED for pharma, biotech or life science organizations?