Home
 /
Papers
 /
Developmental Biology
 /
Unbiased profiling of multipotency landscapes reveals spatial modulators of clonal fate biases
Preprint
Open access
V1
Top 1% · Validated by QED

Unbiased profiling of multipotency landscapes reveals spatial modulators of clonal fate biases

Alek G. Erickson, Sergey Isaev, Artem Artemov +11 more
June 2025
 ·
bioRxiv
 ·
DOI 
10.1101/2024.11.15.623687
94
%
Reproducible
QED Impressions
This paper passed independent validation.
QED's automated review checked the evidence supporting each claim, the statistical methods, and whether the results are reproducible from the data provided.

It ranks in the top 1% of preprints assessed in Developmental Biology this quarter.
Run full QED analysis
Read paper
Save

Why this is interesting

Overturning the discrete tree model of development, this study maps a continuous embryo-wide gradient where position encodes clonal fate, then demonstrates that extrinsic signals causally override axial patterning—making lineage specification mechanistically dissectable in vivo.

QED claims analysis

Summary

In vivo clonal lineage tracing combined with clone2vec machine learning analysis reveals that mouse embryonic development is organized by continuous, embryo-wide spatial gradients of clonal fate biases where anatomical position and clonal composition are mutually predictive through position-specific auxiliary transcriptional programs, and these axial patterning systems can be experimentally overridden by mosaic perturbations of extrinsic signaling pathways such as Hedgehog signaling.

See full analysis
Main Claim 1 –

TREX in vivo clonal tracing profiles embryonic multipotency landscapes

Main Claim 2 –

Clone2vec embeddings capture clonal fate variation in low dimensions

Main Claim 3 –

Spatial gradients link embryonic position to clonal fate composition

Supporting evidence

  • NCC-MP progenitors generate neural crest and mesoderm, not CNS
  • Auxiliary positional programs modulate shared skeletal differentiation pathways
  • Cranial neural crest positional programs shape branchial arch multipotency
  • Cranial neural crest emigration timing biases mesenchymal versus neuroglial fates
  • Trunk neural crest cells are fate-biased, not broadly multipotent
Main Claim 4 –

Mosaic signaling perturbations override axial patterning and alter clonal fates

Supporting evidence

  • Ptch1 perturbation uncouples Hox positional identity from clonal fate
  • Receptor perturbations reciprocally shift neural crest autonomic and sensory fates

Abstract

Embryogenesis is commonly viewed through a tree model of cell differentiation, which fails to capture the spatiotemporal modulation of cell multipotency underlying morphogenesis. In this study we profile the multipotency landscape of the embryo, using in vivo single-cell clonal lineage tracing of mouse embryos traced from neurulation until mid-gestation, combined with a machine learning tool that categorizes individual clones into lineages based on shared transcriptional context. This revealed a previously unrecognized continuous, embryo-wide gradient of clonal fate biases, in which anatomical position and clonal composition are mutually predictive. Comparing clonal lineages revealed gene regulatory networks underlying the dynamic biasing of cells towards specific fates by spatial transcription factor programs. However, mosaic combinatorial perturbations targeting the Hedgehog pathway generated clones in which positional identity was mismatched with clonal composition, demonstrating that extrinsic signals can override the axial patterning system underlying clonal fate biases. Altogether, our work demonstrates an effective practical approach for dissecting mechanisms of lineage specification and has implications for stem cell engineering.

Related papers

How the QED Score works

QED Score is a validated AI-based quality metric that evaluates life science papers on two dimensions: originality and validity. Each manuscript is anonymized, broken down into its claims and supporting evidence, and examined by specialized AI agents for statistical rigor, consistency across figures, and fit with the existing literature. Scores are percentile ranks, so they're comparable across fields. In blinded tests, expert professors sided with QED Score over journal rank in 75% of decisive cases.
Read the methodology

Free access for academic researchers

Create your free QED account to validate your research, strengthen grant proposals, and uncover scientific insights.
We've sent you an access link.
Please check your inbox.

Didn't get your email? Check your spam folder or reach out to info@qedscience.com

Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Looking for QED for pharma, biotech or life science organizations?