Home
 /
Papers
 /
Biochemistry
 /
TRiC folds the giant ciliary protein IFT172 via a non-canonical open-state mechanism
Preprint
Open access
V1
Top 1% · Validated by QED

TRiC folds the giant ciliary protein IFT172 via a non-canonical open-state mechanism

Qiaoyu Zhao, Jiayi Li, Yujie Tong +11 more
March 2026
 ·
bioRxiv
 ·
DOI 
10.64898/2026.03.28.714460
94
%
Reproducible
QED Impressions
This paper passed independent validation.
QED's automated review checked the evidence supporting each claim, the statistical methods, and whether the results are reproducible from the data provided.

It ranks in the top 1% of preprints assessed in Biochemistry this quarter.
Run full QED analysis
Read paper
Save

Why this is interesting

By showing that TRiC folds a 200 kDa ciliary protein via open-state catalysis and closure-triggered ejection rather than encapsulation, this work overturns foundational chaperonin dogma and establishes a paradigm for folding giant, disease-linked proteins.

QED claims analysis

Summary

TRiC folds the giant ciliary protein IFT172 (~200 kDa) through a non-canonical mechanism in which TRiC and HSP70 simultaneously engage distinct domains (WD40 and TPR, respectively), specific TRiC subunits undergo pronounced conformational expansion to accommodate the oversized substrate, and productive folding of the WD40-1 domain occurs within the open ATP-bound chamber followed by substrate ejection upon ring closure rather than encapsulation—a fold-and-eject pathway that is essential for ciliary function in vivo and conserved across multiple IFT subunits with tandem WD40-TPR architecture.

See full analysis
Main Claim 1 –

TRiC forms stable complex with IFT172 and HSP70

Supporting evidence

  • Apo TRiC binds IFT172 with substrate protruding through opening
  • TRiC recognizes IFT172 WD40 domains via disordered terminal tails
  • Ciliopathy IFT172 mutations disrupt TRiC binding and recognition
Main Claim 2 –

TRiC and HSP70 bind distinct IFT172 domains simultaneously

Supporting evidence

  • TRiC Z-shaped subunit bending expands chamber for oversized substrates
Main Claim 3 –

Open ATP-bound TRiC folds IFT172 WD40-1 before closure

Supporting evidence

  • TRiC ring closure ejects IFT172 rather than encapsulating it
Main Claim 4 –

TRiC is required for functional intraflagellar transport in vivo

Supporting evidence

  • TRiC binds multiple WD40-TPR IFT subunits as folding hub

Abstract

The eukaryotic chaperonin TRiC/CCT is essential for folding complex proteins, yet how it folds substrates that exceed its closed chamber capacity remains a longstanding paradox. Here, we define the folding pathway of IFT172, the largest subunit (∼200 kDa) of the intraflagellar transport (IFT) machinery, and uncover a “divide-and-conquer” mechanism. TRiC and HSP70 engage IFT172 concurrently but on distinct domains: TRiC captures the N-terminal WD40 β-propellers within its chamber, whereas HSP70 independently stabilizes the C-terminal TPR domain in the cytosol. To accommodate this oversized client, specific TRiC subunits (CCT4, CCT2, and CCT7) undergo pronounced Z-shaped outward bending, thereby expanding the chamber. Unexpectedly, the first WD40 domain reaches a near-folded state within the open, ATP-bound chamber, and subsequent TRiC ring closure triggers substrate ejection rather than encapsulation. This non-canonical “fold-and-eject” mechanism challenges the classical view that the closed chamber is an obligate folding cage. We further demonstrate that this pathway is essential for ciliary functions in vivo, and reveal a conserved mode of chaperonin recognition among IFT components bearing tandem WD40-TPR architectures. Together, our findings establish a new paradigm for the folding of oversized, multi-domain proteins and identify TRiC as a central proteostasis hub in ciliary biogenesis, with direct implications for ciliopathy pathogenesis.

Related papers

How the QED Score works

QED Score is a validated AI-based quality metric that evaluates life science papers on two dimensions: originality and validity. Each manuscript is anonymized, broken down into its claims and supporting evidence, and examined by specialized AI agents for statistical rigor, consistency across figures, and fit with the existing literature. Scores are percentile ranks, so they're comparable across fields. In blinded tests, expert professors sided with QED Score over journal rank in 75% of decisive cases.
Read the methodology

Free access for academic researchers

Create your free QED account to validate your research, strengthen grant proposals, and uncover scientific insights.
We've sent you an access link.
Please check your inbox.

Didn't get your email? Check your spam folder or reach out to info@qedscience.com

Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Looking for QED for pharma, biotech or life science organizations?