Home
 /
Papers
 /
Cancer Biology
 /
The subclonal footprint of pervasive early dissemination in pancreatic cancer
Preprint
Open access
V1
Top 1% · Validated by QED

The subclonal footprint of pervasive early dissemination in pancreatic cancer

Yuanchang Fang, Michelle Chan-Seng-Yue, Karen Ng +26 more
December 2025
 ·
bioRxiv
 ·
DOI 
10.1101/2025.11.27.690823
94
%
Reproducible
QED Impressions
This paper passed independent validation.
QED's automated review checked the evidence supporting each claim, the statistical methods, and whether the results are reproducible from the data provided.

It ranks in the top 1% of preprints assessed in Cancer Biology this quarter.
Run full QED analysis
Read paper
Save

Why this is interesting

By showing that liver metastases—not primary tumor size—govern ctDNA shedding, and that disseminated subclones shed signal years before detection, this work overturns liquid biopsy assumptions and reframes early detection strategy in pancreatic cancer.

QED claims analysis

Summary

Pancreatic cancer exhibits pervasive early dissemination where ctDNA shedding is uncoupled from primary tumor size and instead reflects organ-site-specific metastatic burden, with the plasma signal in low-shedding patients dominated by disseminated subclones that seed metastases and shed detectable ctDNA years before clinical detection, explaining why early-stage disease remains undetectable until systemic spread has already occurred.

See full analysis
Main Claim 1 –

Low ctDNA Plasma Signal Dominated by Rare High-VAF Variants

Supporting evidence

  • Plasma Fragmentomics Yields Mutation-Independent Pancreatic Cancer Signature
  • TFx Detects ctDNA to 5×10^-4 and Outperforms Methods
Main Claim 2 –

ctDNA Tracks Metastatic Organ Site, Not Primary Tumour Size

Supporting evidence

  • ctDNA and CA19-9 Provide Non-Interchangeable Biomarker Information
  • Whole-Genome Duplication Is Linked to Higher ctDNA Tumour Fraction
  • Humoral and Systemic Immune Context Modulates ctDNA Shedding
Main Claim 3 –

Low ctDNA Shedding Enriches Plasma for Subclonal Mutations

Supporting evidence

  • Metastases Show Higher Mutation Burden with Classic PDA Genomics
Main Claim 4 –

Subclones Seed Metastases and Shed ctDNA Years Pre-Detection

Supporting evidence

  • Primary Tumour Seeds Lung and Liver Metastases Independently, Early
  • ctDNA Reveals Liver Response and Peritoneal Resistance During Therapy
  • ctDNA Detectable Months Before Diagnosis in High-Risk Surveillance

Abstract

‘Early is too late’ describes a central problem in pancreatic cancer referring to its relentless drive to disseminate and highlights the need to understand how this disease spreads so rapidly. In this study, we profiled 1,013 samples from 277 donors, including tissue whole genome and RNA sequencing combined with plasma whole genome sequencing at ∼25x. Strikingly, local primary tumours, including some reaching 7cm, were found to shed little to no circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA). Instead, metastatic burden in the liver but not extrahepatic sites, was a main physiologic determinant of ctDNA levels. Whole-genome duplication (WGD), high cell cycle activity, and non-glandular differentiation emerged as tumour-intrinsic features related to increased ctDNA shedding. By contrast, decreased shedding was related to extrinsic features including a reactive microenvironment and unexpectedly, humoral immunity. Analysis of tumour clonal architecture showed that in patients with low ctDNA levels, the signal disproportionately originated from subclones and this signal persisted even when the primary tumour was removed. Disseminated subclones were a significant source of ctDNA in early-stage patients. Longitudinal analysis of patients revealed that subclones seeded metastases and shed ctDNA in the blood years before detection. This first report of paired tissue and plasma whole genomes in pancreatic cancer is a unique resource and has broad implications for disease surveillance, treatment monitoring, and early detection in this disease.

Related papers

How the QED Score works

QED Score is a validated AI-based quality metric that evaluates life science papers on two dimensions: originality and validity. Each manuscript is anonymized, broken down into its claims and supporting evidence, and examined by specialized AI agents for statistical rigor, consistency across figures, and fit with the existing literature. Scores are percentile ranks, so they're comparable across fields. In blinded tests, expert professors sided with QED Score over journal rank in 75% of decisive cases.
Read the methodology

Free access for academic researchers

Create your free QED account to validate your research, strengthen grant proposals, and uncover scientific insights.
We've sent you an access link.
Please check your inbox.

Didn't get your email? Check your spam folder or reach out to info@qedscience.com

Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Looking for QED for pharma, biotech or life science organizations?