Home
 /
Papers
 /
Biophysics
 /
Structures of protein folding intermediates on the ribosome
Preprint
Open access
V1
Top 1% · Validated by QED

Structures of protein folding intermediates on the ribosome

Sammy H.S. Chan, Julian O. Streit, Tomasz Włodarski +5 more
June 2025
 ·
bioRxiv
 ·
DOI 
10.1101/2025.04.07.647236
94
%
Reproducible
QED Impressions
This paper passed independent validation.
QED's automated review checked the evidence supporting each claim, the statistical methods, and whether the results are reproducible from the data provided.

It ranks in the top 1% of preprints assessed in Biophysics this quarter.
Run full QED analysis
Read paper
Save

Why this is interesting

Solving the first atomistic structures of co-translational folding intermediates, this work overturns the assumption that biosynthetic folding mirrors in vitro mechanisms, revealing parallel ribosome-directed pathways that prevent kinetic traps and safeguard cellular proteostasis.

QED claims analysis

Summary

Co-translational folding of immunoglobulin-like domains proceeds through two distinct, thermodynamically stable intermediate structures that represent parallel folding pathways initiated from opposite termini, with atomistic structures revealing that the ribosome guides native structure acquisition through a conserved mechanism across filamin domains that differs fundamentally from in vitro refolding pathways.

See full analysis
Main Claim 1 –

Ribosome Stabilizes Two FLN5 Co-Translational Folding Intermediates

Supporting evidence

  • Ring-Current 19F Shifts Report β-Strand Contacts in Intermediates
  • Bi-Histidine Metal Binding Selectively Stabilizes Intermediates for NMR Assignment
Main Claim 2 –

Atomistic I1 and I2 Structures Define Parallel Co-Translational Pathways

Supporting evidence

  • 19F PRE Distances Validate Long-Range Features of Intermediate Models
  • Intermediates Bind Ribosomal Proteins More Than Native State
  • Cryo-EM Densities Better Fit with Intermediate Ensembles Included
  • Pro742 Cis–Trans Isomerization Switches G-Strand Folding and Intermediate Identity
Main Claim 3 –

Parallel Co-Translational Pathways Conserved in Filamins, Diverge in I27

Abstract

The ribosome biases the conformations sampled by nascent polypeptide chains along folding pathways towards biologically active states. A hallmark of the co-translational folding (coTF) of many proteins are highly stable folding intermediates that are absent or only transiently populated off the ribosome, yet persist during translation well-beyond complete emergence of the domain from the ribosome exit tunnel. Intermediates are important for folding fidelity; however, their structures have remained elusive. Here, we have structurally characterised two coTF intermediates of an immunoglobulin-like domain by developing comprehensive 19F NMR analyses using chemical shifts, paramagnetic relaxation enhancement (PRE), and protein engineering. We integrated these experimental data with extensive molecular dynamics (MD) simulations to obtain atomistic structures of the folding intermediates on the ribosome. The resulting intermediate structures are distinguished by native-like folds initiated from either their N-or C-termini, and reveal parallel folding pathways, which are structurally conserved within the protein domain family, in contrast to their in vitro refolding mechanisms. By redirecting proteins to fold along hierarchical, parallel routes, the ribosome may promote efficient folding by avoiding kinetic traps, and regulate nascent chain assembly and targeting by auxiliary factors to maintain cellular proteostasis.

Related papers

How the QED Score works

QED Score is a validated AI-based quality metric that evaluates life science papers on two dimensions: originality and validity. Each manuscript is anonymized, broken down into its claims and supporting evidence, and examined by specialized AI agents for statistical rigor, consistency across figures, and fit with the existing literature. Scores are percentile ranks, so they're comparable across fields. In blinded tests, expert professors sided with QED Score over journal rank in 75% of decisive cases.
Read the methodology

Free access for academic researchers

Create your free QED account to validate your research, strengthen grant proposals, and uncover scientific insights.
We've sent you an access link.
Please check your inbox.

Didn't get your email? Check your spam folder or reach out to info@qedscience.com

Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Looking for QED for pharma, biotech or life science organizations?