Home
 /
Papers
 /
Genomics
 /
Spatial joint profiling of DNA methylome and transcriptome in mammalian tissues
Preprint
Open access
V1
Top 1% · Validated by QED

Spatial joint profiling of DNA methylome and transcriptome in mammalian tissues

Chin Nien Lee, Hongxiang Fu, Angelysia Cardilla +2 more
July 2025
 ·
bioRxiv
 ·
DOI 
10.1101/2025.07.01.662607
94
%
Reproducible
QED Impressions
This paper passed independent validation.
QED's automated review checked the evidence supporting each claim, the statistical methods, and whether the results are reproducible from the data provided.

It ranks in the top 1% of preprints assessed in Genomics this quarter.
Run full QED analysis
Read paper
Save

Why this is interesting

This work makes spatial epigenomics a reality by achieving the first simultaneous in situ profiling of DNA methylation and transcriptome, revealing how methylation orchestrates gene regulation across tissue architecture in mammalian development and brain function.

QED claims analysis

Summary

Spatial-DMT enables simultaneous profiling of DNA methylation and transcription at near single-cell resolution in intact tissues, revealing that integrated analysis of both modalities provides enhanced discrimination of cellular identities and uncovers coordinated epigenetic-transcriptional dynamics during mammalian embryogenesis and brain development, including region-specific and gene-specific regulatory patterns where mCG and mCA differentially control gene expression across developmental stages and brain regions.

See full analysis
Main Claim 1 –

Spatial-DMT Co-profiles Spatial DNA Methylation and Transcriptome Near Single-Cell

Supporting evidence

  • Spatial-DMT Shows High Replicate Reproducibility for Methylation and Expression
  • PMD Methylation Gradients Reveal Tissue-Specific Mitotic Histories In Situ
Main Claim 2 –

Integrated DNA Methylation–RNA Clustering Improves Spatial Resolution Over Single Modality

Supporting evidence

  • Spatial Clusters Show Positive and Negative Methylation–Expression Coupling with TF Motifs
  • Spatial Methylation Resolves Epigenetically Primed Subpopulations Despite Similar Transcription
Main Claim 3 –

E11-to-E13 Upregulated Genes Show Coordinated DNA Demethylation Dynamics

Supporting evidence

  • Oligodendrogenesis Tracks Subpallium-to-Pallium Migration with Coupled Methylation–Expression Changes
Main Claim 4 –

Region-Specific mCG and mCA Patterns Regulate Brain Gene Expression

Supporting evidence

  • Spatial-DMT Brain Clusters Match Single-Cell References and Anatomical Distributions

Abstract

The spatial resolution of omics dynamics is fundamental to understanding tissue biology. Spatial profiling of DNA methylation, which is a canonical epigenetic mark extensively implicated in transcriptional regulation, remains an unmet demand. Here, we introduce a method for whole genome spatial co-profiling of DNA methylation and transcriptome of the same tissue section at near single-cell resolution. Applying this technology to mouse embryogenesis and postnatal brain resulted in rich DNA-RNA bimodal tissue maps. These maps revealed the spatial context of known methylation biology and its interplay with gene expression. The two modalities’ concordance and distinction in spatial patterns highlighted a synergistic molecular definition of cell identity in spatial programming of mammalian development and brain function. By integrating spatial maps of mouse embryos at two different developmental stages, we reconstructed the dynamics of both epigenome and transcriptome underlying mammalian embryogenesis, revealing details in sequence, cell type, and region-specific methylation-mediated transcriptional regulation. This method extends the scope of spatial omics to DNA cytosine methylation for a more comprehensive understanding of tissue biology over development and disease.

Related papers

How the QED Score works

QED Score is a validated AI-based quality metric that evaluates life science papers on two dimensions: originality and validity. Each manuscript is anonymized, broken down into its claims and supporting evidence, and examined by specialized AI agents for statistical rigor, consistency across figures, and fit with the existing literature. Scores are percentile ranks, so they're comparable across fields. In blinded tests, expert professors sided with QED Score over journal rank in 75% of decisive cases.
Read the methodology

Free access for academic researchers

Create your free QED account to validate your research, strengthen grant proposals, and uncover scientific insights.
We've sent you an access link.
Please check your inbox.

Didn't get your email? Check your spam folder or reach out to info@qedscience.com

Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Looking for QED for pharma, biotech or life science organizations?