Home
 /
Papers
 /
Molecular Biology
 /
Sequence grammar and dynamics of subcellular translation revealed by APEX-Ribo-Seq
Preprint
Open access
V1
Top 1% · Validated by QED

Sequence grammar and dynamics of subcellular translation revealed by APEX-Ribo-Seq

Kotaro Tomuro, Takanori Akaiwa, Akane Harada +5 more
June 2025
 ·
bioRxiv
 ·
DOI 
10.1101/2025.05.26.656194
94
%
Reproducible
QED Impressions
This paper passed independent validation.
QED's automated review checked the evidence supporting each claim, the statistical methods, and whether the results are reproducible from the data provided.

It ranks in the top 1% of preprints assessed in Molecular Biology this quarter.
Run full QED analysis
Read paper
Save

Why this is interesting

By mapping active translation across 14 subcellular compartments, APEX-Ribo-Seq transforms local translation from an organelle-by-organelle puzzle into a comprehensive, dynamic atlas, unlocking the RBP logic and sequence grammar that directs proteins to precise cellular destinations.

QED claims analysis

Summary

APEX-Ribo-Seq reveals that local translation occurs at 14 distinct subcellular compartments with over 3000 genes translated in compartment-specific patterns, regulated by diverse mechanisms including RNA-binding protein-mediated sequence recognition and onsite translational control that vary across organelles, with dynamic modulation during cell cycle progression and stress responses, and distinct translation programs in neuronal dendrites, axons, and presynapses.

See full analysis
Main Claim 1 –

APEX-Ribo-Seq Profiles Genome-Wide Local Translation at High Resolution

Supporting evidence

  • APEX-Ribo-Seq Separately Captures Cytosolic Versus Mitochondrial Translation
  • APEX-Ribo-Seq Identifies 979 ER Membrane-Translated mRNAs
  • APEX-Ribo-Seq Identifies 992 Outer Mitochondrial Membrane-Translated mRNAs
Main Claim 2 –

Over 3000 Genes Locally Translated Across 14 Compartments

Supporting evidence

  • Translation Sites Match Protein Localization and Supply Organelle Complexes
Main Claim 3 –

Compartment-Specific Local Translation Uses RNA Localization and Onsite Control

Supporting evidence

  • RBPs Drive Compartment Translation via Predictable Sequence Interactions
  • ERM and OMM Translation Slows During Cotranslational Membrane Insertion
Main Claim 4 –

Centrosomal Local Translation Programs Change Across Cell Cycle Phases

Supporting evidence

  • Stress Granules Recruit Many mRNAs but Translate Select Targets
  • Starvation Induces Autophagosomal Translation of Positively Charged Proteins

Abstract

Local translation at specific subcellular regions is proposed to define appropriate protein destinations and functions. However, our understanding of local translation is still far from complete, due to a lack of versatile analysis tools. Here, we developed a new method, termed “APEX-Ribo-Seq”, that integrates ribosome profiling (Ribo-Seq) with APEX2-based proximity labeling. We mapped local translation at 14 distinct organelles and identified over 3000 genes that are locally translated. Interpretable machine learning methods based on RNA language models systematically uncovered RNA-binding proteins with key roles in compartment-specific translation. In addition, we revealed slow translation kinetics associated with cotranslational membrane insertion of nascent chains. APEX-Ribo-Seq also captured cell cycle-regulated dynamics at the centrosome and stress-regulated programs at stress granules and autophagosomes. We also demonstrated the utility of APEX-Ribo-Seq in primary neurons, revealing compartment-specific translatomes in dendrites, axons, and presynapses. Our results provide a comprehensive view of the spatiotemporal translatome and its regulation.

Related papers

How the QED Score works

QED Score is a validated AI-based quality metric that evaluates life science papers on two dimensions: originality and validity. Each manuscript is anonymized, broken down into its claims and supporting evidence, and examined by specialized AI agents for statistical rigor, consistency across figures, and fit with the existing literature. Scores are percentile ranks, so they're comparable across fields. In blinded tests, expert professors sided with QED Score over journal rank in 75% of decisive cases.
Read the methodology

Free access for academic researchers

Create your free QED account to validate your research, strengthen grant proposals, and uncover scientific insights.
We've sent you an access link.
Please check your inbox.

Didn't get your email? Check your spam folder or reach out to info@qedscience.com

Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Looking for QED for pharma, biotech or life science organizations?