Home
 /
Papers
 /
Cancer Biology
 /
Proximity-Informed Graph Learning Defines Spatial Protein Communities for Tumor-Associated Proximity Antigen Discovery
Preprint
Open access
V1
Top 1% · Validated by QED

Proximity-Informed Graph Learning Defines Spatial Protein Communities for Tumor-Associated Proximity Antigen Discovery

Cody Scandore, Clare F. Malone, Christopher K. May +31 more
February 2026
 ·
bioRxiv
 ·
DOI 
10.64898/2026.02.13.705629
94
%
Reproducible
QED Impressions
This paper passed independent validation.
QED's automated review checked the evidence supporting each claim, the statistical methods, and whether the results are reproducible from the data provided.

It ranks in the top 1% of preprints assessed in Cancer Biology this quarter.
Run full QED analysis
Read paper
Save

Why this is interesting

By demonstrating that spatial proximity—not expression alone—defines actionable tumor antigen pairs, this work overturns a foundational assumption in therapeutic oncology and unlocks proximity-defined co-targets with enhanced tumor selectivity and killing potency.

QED claims analysis

Summary

Industrialized surface protein proximity mapping across 248 RTK-anchored microenvironments in diverse cancer cell systems, combined with correlation-based MetaMap analysis and graph-based machine learning integration of proximity and abundance data, identifies tumor-associated proximity antigens (TAPAs) as a new class of co-targets defined by disease-specific spatial organization rather than expression alone, exemplified by EGFR×CDCP1 co-targeting that achieves superior tumor cell killing across ADC and T cell engager modalities through dual-antigen-dependent mechanisms.

See full analysis
Main Claim 1 –

Scalable RTK proximity mapping reveals structured tumor surface interactomes

Main Claim 2 –

MetaMap correlations infer spatial protein communities and non-targeted proximities

Main Claim 3 –

Graph learning identifies CDCP1 as an EGFR proximity partner

Supporting evidence

  • EGFR–CDCP1 proximity persists in resistant tumors but weakens in normal cells
Main Claim 4 –

EGFR×CDCP1 bispecific ADCs outperform monospecific cytotoxicity in cancer cells

Supporting evidence

  • EGFR×CDCP1 bispecifics enhance internalization via cooperative cis-engagement
  • EGFR×CDCP1 ADCs improve low-dose efficacy and xenograft survival
  • EGFR×CDCP1 ADC efficacy requires dual-antigen engagement in vivo
  • EGFR×CDCP1 proximity co-targeting boosts T cell engager cytotoxicity

Abstract

The spatial organization of membrane proteins is an underexplored dimension of cell-surface biology. Spatial proximity shapes cellular function and therapeutic targetability, yet efforts to identify tumor-associated antigens (TAAs) have largely focused on expression alone. Here, we developed an industrialized surface-protein proximity mapping workflow to interrogate TAAs within their membrane microenvironments. In the process, we generated 248 proximity maps across 12 receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) and 28 tumor cell systems. This proximity atlas enabled two advances: first, MetaMap, a correlation-based analytical framework that defines spatial protein communities and infers non-targeted proximal proteins from reproducible proximity signatures; and second, tumor-associated proximity antigens (TAPAs), a conceptual class of co-targets defined by disease-specific spatial proximity to TAAs rather than expression alone. Applying these proximity-derived relationships within a multimodal prioritization framework, we identified and validated an EGFR×CDCP1 TAA-TAPA pair that enhanced tumor cell killing across therapeutic modalities. By integrating spatial organization with multimodal data, this work expands the design space for precision-guided therapeutic strategies.

Related papers

How the QED Score works

QED Score is a validated AI-based quality metric that evaluates life science papers on two dimensions: originality and validity. Each manuscript is anonymized, broken down into its claims and supporting evidence, and examined by specialized AI agents for statistical rigor, consistency across figures, and fit with the existing literature. Scores are percentile ranks, so they're comparable across fields. In blinded tests, expert professors sided with QED Score over journal rank in 75% of decisive cases.
Read the methodology

Free access for academic researchers

Create your free QED account to validate your research, strengthen grant proposals, and uncover scientific insights.
We've sent you an access link.
Please check your inbox.

Didn't get your email? Check your spam folder or reach out to info@qedscience.com

Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Looking for QED for pharma, biotech or life science organizations?