Home
 /
Papers
 /
Biophysics
 /
Proteome-scale quantification of the interactions driving condensate formation of intrinsically disordered proteins
Preprint
Open access
V1
Top 1% · Validated by QED

Proteome-scale quantification of the interactions driving condensate formation of intrinsically disordered proteins

Rasmus K. Norrild, Sören von Bülow, Einar Halldórsson +3 more
May 2025
 ·
bioRxiv
 ·
DOI 
10.1101/2024.12.21.629870
94
%
Reproducible
QED Impressions
This paper passed independent validation.
QED's automated review checked the evidence supporting each claim, the statistical methods, and whether the results are reproducible from the data provided.

It ranks in the top 1% of preprints assessed in Biophysics this quarter.
Run full QED analysis
Read paper
Save

Why this is interesting

By measuring partitioning energies across >100,000 peptides simultaneously, CPmD overturns the assumption that sequence-specific motifs drive phase separation—amino acid composition alone governs condensation—enabling accurate, proteome-scale prediction of IDR-driven condensate formation.

Author perspective

What is the most important insight, discovery, or finding from your paper that you would like other scientists to know?
“

We have developed Condensate Partitioning by mRNA display (CPmD) to quantify the weak interactions driving partitioning into, and formation of, biomolecular condensates by disordered proteins at the proteome scale. Using CPmD, we show that amino acid composition governs overall phase behavior, while our method allows to measure sequence-dependent interactions that determine which disordered proteins condense together.

”
Alexander Buell

QED claims analysis

Summary

Proteome-scale measurement of peptide partitioning into reconstituted condensates reveals that amino acid composition, rather than specific sequence motifs, primarily determines condensate formation of intrinsically disordered regions, with experimentally derived amino acid-specific partition free energies representing fundamental physicochemical interactions that quantitatively predict phase separation behavior across diverse IDRs and correlate with established computational models of disordered protein behavior.

See full analysis
Main Claim 1 –

CPmD Peptide Partitioning Quantifies Condensate Formation Propensity

Supporting evidence

  • DDX4N1 Partitioning Scales with Length and Shows ~40-aa Periodicity
Main Claim 2 –

Amino Acid Composition Dominates Condensate Partitioning Over Motifs

Supporting evidence

  • Aromatics and Arginine Drive DDX4N1 Partitioning via Hydrophobicity
  • Amino Acid Composition Explains ~80% of Partitioning Variance
Main Claim 3 –

Fifteen Percent of IDRs Strongly Enrich in DDX4N1 Condensates

Supporting evidence

  • Condensate-Forming IDRs Partition Strongly but Show Higher Sequence Specificity
Main Claim 4 –

DDX4N1 Partitioning Interactions Capture General IDR Phase Separation

Supporting evidence

  • Mean-Field Energy-Density Model Links Partitioning to Homotypic Phase Separation
  • Composition Model Predicts Diverse IDR Condensation and Matches Simulations
  • Amino Acid Partition Energies Correlate with CALVADOS Stickiness Parameters

Abstract

Intrinsically disordered protein regions facilitate cellular organization through phase separation into biomolecular condensates. However, the molecular interactions driving this process remain poorly understood because of experimental limitations. Here, we advance experimental throughput by several orders of magnitude by developing Condensate Partitioning by mRNA-Display (CPmD). The method allows analysis of partitioning of hundred thousand peptides derived from the disordered proteome into reconstituted condensates. Our results demonstrate that the amino acid content, rather than specific sequence, primarily determines partitioning behavior. Importantly, quantification of the partitioning energies of peptides allows us to decipher the ‘molecular grammar’ of the relevant interactions, allowing accurate prediction of the formation of condensates of diverse full-length disordered protein regions. The results reveal how physicochemical properties of disordered regions encode biological functions through formation of biomolecular condensates.

Related papers

How the QED Score works

QED Score is a validated AI-based quality metric that evaluates life science papers on two dimensions: originality and validity. Each manuscript is anonymized, broken down into its claims and supporting evidence, and examined by specialized AI agents for statistical rigor, consistency across figures, and fit with the existing literature. Scores are percentile ranks, so they're comparable across fields. In blinded tests, expert professors sided with QED Score over journal rank in 75% of decisive cases.
Read the methodology

Free access for academic researchers

Create your free QED account to validate your research, strengthen grant proposals, and uncover scientific insights.
We've sent you an access link.
Please check your inbox.

Didn't get your email? Check your spam folder or reach out to info@qedscience.com

Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Looking for QED for pharma, biotech or life science organizations?