Home
 /
Papers
 /
Molecular Biology
 /
PDS5 proteins control genome architecture by limiting the lifetime of cohesin-NIPBL complexes
Preprint
Open access
V1
Top 1% · Validated by QED

PDS5 proteins control genome architecture by limiting the lifetime of cohesin-NIPBL complexes

Gordana Wutz, Iain F Davidson, Edward J Banigan +10 more
September 2025
 ·
bioRxiv
 ·
DOI 
10.1101/2025.08.30.673243
94
%
Reproducible
QED Impressions
This paper passed independent validation.
QED's automated review checked the evidence supporting each claim, the statistical methods, and whether the results are reproducible from the data provided.

It ranks in the top 1% of preprints assessed in Molecular Biology this quarter.
Run full QED analysis
Read paper
Save

Why this is interesting

This work solves the long-standing mystery of CTCF boundary formation by revealing that PDS5 proteins eject NIPBL from cohesin to halt loop extrusion, while establishing a new kinetic framework governing genome compartmentalization.

QED claims analysis

Summary

PDS5 proteins control genome architecture by actively facilitating the dissociation of NIPBL from loop-extruding cohesin complexes, thereby limiting cohesin-NIPBL lifetime and average extrusion velocity, which strengthens CTCF boundary function and modulates chromatin compartmentalization through the dynamic interplay between loop extrusion and polymer relaxation timescales.

See full analysis
Main Claim 1 –

PDS5 Proteins Are Required for CTCF Boundary Integrity

Supporting evidence

  • PDS5A/B Depletion Recapitulates Subsets of CTCF and WAPL Phenotypes
  • PDS5 Proteins Are Dispensable for CTCF Genomic Site Binding
  • PDS5A/B Depletion Induces Cohesin Islands at Non-CTCF Sites
  • SMC3 Acetylation Does Not Explain PDS5-Dependent CTCF Boundaries
Main Claim 2 –

Compartmentalization Depends on Polymer Relaxation and Loop Extrusion Dynamics

Supporting evidence

  • WAPL and PDS5A/B Co-depletion Partially Restores Short-Range Compartments
  • WAPL and PDS5A/B Co-depletion Additively Extends Cohesin Residence Time
Main Claim 3 –

PDS5 Proteins Compete with NIPBL for Cohesin Binding

Supporting evidence

  • PDS5 Depletion Increases NIPBL Occupancy on Chromatin-Bound Cohesin
Main Claim 4 –

PDS5 Facilitates NIPBL Dissociation from Cohesin During Loop Extrusion

Supporting evidence

  • NIPBL Loss Triggers Cohesin Release and DNA Loop Dissolution

Abstract

Cohesin-NIPBL complexes extrude genomic DNA into loops that are constrained by CTCF boundaries. This process has important regulatory functions and weakens the separation between euchromatic and heterochromatic compartments. Cohesin can also bind PDS5A or PDS5B, which do not support loop extrusion but are required for the formation of CTCF boundaries. How PDS5 proteins perform this function is unknown. Here we show by in vitro single-molecule imaging that PDS5 proteins stop loop extrusion by facilitating the dissociation of NIPBL from cohesin. Hi-C experiments suggest that this function is required for the establishment of CTCF boundaries in cells. In silico modelling indicates that PDS5 proteins enable the separation between compartments by limiting cohesin’s velocity and chromatin-residence time. The degree of this compartmentalization depends on the frequency with which chromatin is extruded relative to the time it takes for compartments to form. These results identify PDS5 proteins as key regulators of genome organization.

Highlights

PDS5 proteins stop loop extrusion by facilitating dissociation of NIPBL from cohesin.

PDS5 proteins strengthen CTCF boundaries by limiting the lifetime of cohesin-NIPBL.

PDS5 proteins regulate compartmentalization.

Compartmentalization is governed by polymer relaxation and loop extrusion dynamics.

Related papers

How the QED Score works

QED Score is a validated AI-based quality metric that evaluates life science papers on two dimensions: originality and validity. Each manuscript is anonymized, broken down into its claims and supporting evidence, and examined by specialized AI agents for statistical rigor, consistency across figures, and fit with the existing literature. Scores are percentile ranks, so they're comparable across fields. In blinded tests, expert professors sided with QED Score over journal rank in 75% of decisive cases.
Read the methodology

Free access for academic researchers

Create your free QED account to validate your research, strengthen grant proposals, and uncover scientific insights.
We've sent you an access link.
Please check your inbox.

Didn't get your email? Check your spam folder or reach out to info@qedscience.com

Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Looking for QED for pharma, biotech or life science organizations?