Home
 /
Papers
 /
Neuroscience
 /
Native receptor-targeted chemogenetics enables cell-type-specific inhibition of endogenous receptors in freely moving mice
Preprint
Open access
V1
Top 1% · Validated by QED

Native receptor-targeted chemogenetics enables cell-type-specific inhibition of endogenous receptors in freely moving…

Tomohiro Doura, Wataru Kakegawa, Keigo Morikawa +15 more
February 2026
 ·
bioRxiv
 ·
DOI 
10.64898/2026.02.23.707339
94
%
Reproducible
QED Impressions
This paper passed independent validation.
QED's automated review checked the evidence supporting each claim, the statistical methods, and whether the results are reproducible from the data provided.

It ranks in the top 1% of preprints assessed in Neuroscience this quarter.
Run full QED analysis
Read paper
Save

Why this is interesting

By enabling cell-type-specific, reversible inhibition of endogenous receptors in vivo for the first time, NARCH transforms receptor pharmacology into a precision circuit tool—revealing that Purkinje-cell mGlu1 drives motor learning consolidation, not baseline coordination.

QED claims analysis

Summary

Native receptor-targeted chemogenetics (NARCH) enables reversible, cell-type-specific inhibition of endogenous G protein-coupled receptors in vivo by combining structure-guided receptor engineering with allosteric ligand design, creating receptor-inhibitor pairs in which the designer inhibitor acts as a negative allosteric modulator on wild-type receptors but as a silent allosteric ligand on engineered mutant receptors. Application of NARCH to metabotropic glutamate receptor 1 (mGlu1) reveals that mGlu1 signaling in cerebellar Purkinje cells is specifically required for consolidation rather than acquisition of motor learning, demonstrating that NARCH can dissect receptor functions with temporal and cellular precision that is inaccessible to conventional genetic or pharmacological approaches.

See full analysis
Main Claim 1 –

FPET is WT mGlu1 NAM but T748W silent ligand

Supporting evidence

  • FPET binds mGlu1(T748W) but lacks negative allosteric efficacy
  • MD shows mGlu1(T748W)-FPET samples more active-like conformations
Main Claim 2 –

MPET crosses BBB and reversibly occupies endogenous mGlu1

Supporting evidence

  • MPET improves properties over FPET while retaining chemogenetic selectivity
  • Oral MPET yields ~90% mGlu1 occupancy for 45 minutes
Main Claim 3 –

Conditional mGlu1(T748W) knock-in enables cell-type-specific NARCH control

Supporting evidence

  • mGlu1(T748W) knock-in preserves normal expression and synaptic localization
Main Claim 4 –

MPET selectively inhibits endogenous mGlu1 signaling in cerebellar tissue

Supporting evidence

  • MPET blocks mGlu1-dependent cerebellar LTD with cell-type specificity

Abstract

Understanding brain function requires tools that allow precise manipulation of receptor signaling in defined cell types within intact neural circuits. Optogenetics and conventional chemogenetic approaches primarily enable cell-type-specific control of neuronal excitability using engineered receptors or ion channels. However, direct and reversible inhibition of endogenous neurotransmitter receptors in defined cell types has remained technically inaccessible. Here, we introduce native receptor-targeted chemogenetics (NARCH), a chemogenetic strategy that integrates structure-guided receptor engineering with allosteric ligand design to achieve reversible and temporally precise inhibition of endogenous receptor signaling with cell-type specificity in vivo. By applying NARCH to metabotropic glutamate receptor 1 (mGlu1), we demonstrate that mGlu1 signaling in cerebellar Purkinje cells is required for stabilization of motor learning across training sessions in freely moving mice. NARCH thus establishes a receptor-level chemogenetic framework for causal analysis of neural circuits and behavior.

Related papers

How the QED Score works

QED Score is a validated AI-based quality metric that evaluates life science papers on two dimensions: originality and validity. Each manuscript is anonymized, broken down into its claims and supporting evidence, and examined by specialized AI agents for statistical rigor, consistency across figures, and fit with the existing literature. Scores are percentile ranks, so they're comparable across fields. In blinded tests, expert professors sided with QED Score over journal rank in 75% of decisive cases.
Read the methodology

Free access for academic researchers

Create your free QED account to validate your research, strengthen grant proposals, and uncover scientific insights.
We've sent you an access link.
Please check your inbox.

Didn't get your email? Check your spam folder or reach out to info@qedscience.com

Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Looking for QED for pharma, biotech or life science organizations?