Home
 /
Papers
 /
Molecular Biology
 /
Molecular basis of polyadenylated RNA fate determination in the nucleus
Preprint
Open access
V1
Top 1% · Validated by QED

Molecular basis of polyadenylated RNA fate determination in the nucleus

Andrii Bugai, Ulrich Hohmann, Ana Lorenzo +12 more
September 2025
 ·
bioRxiv
 ·
DOI 
10.1101/2025.09.16.676470
94
%
Reproducible
QED Impressions
This paper passed independent validation.
QED's automated review checked the evidence supporting each claim, the statistical methods, and whether the results are reproducible from the data provided.

It ranks in the top 1% of preprints assessed in Molecular Biology this quarter.
Run full QED analysis
Read paper
Save

Why this is interesting

By discovering that PAXT harbors a TREX-2-like module that competes with export machinery for UAP56-bound transcripts, this work reveals how subnuclear localization governs RNA fate and solves a fundamental paradox in gene expression.

QED claims analysis

Summary

Nuclear polyadenylated RNA fate is determined by competition between the nucleoplasmic PAXT connection and nuclear pore-associated TREX-2 complex, both of which utilize structurally equivalent TREX-2-like modules (LENG8-PS and GANP-PS, respectively) to target UAP56-bound RNPs, with their distinct subcellular localizations governing the degradation of short, intron-poor transcripts while allowing export of longer, functional mRNAs.

See full analysis
Main Claim 1 –

LENG8-PS Is a Nucleoplasmic PAXT Complex Module

Supporting evidence

  • LENG8 and SAC3D1 SAC3 Wedge Loops Resemble GANP
  • LENG8-PS and SAC3D1-PS Strongly Stimulate UAP56 ATPase
  • LENG8-PS and SAC3D1-PS Release RNA-Bound UAP56
  • SAC3D1 Wedge Loop Primes UAP56 for RNA Displacement
  • LENG8 and PCID2 Co-localize with ZFC3H1 in Nucleoplasm
  • ZFC3H1 730–747 and LENG8 F301 Mediate PAXT Binding
  • ZFC3H1–LENG8 Interaction Is Required for PAXT RNA Decay
  • LENG8 and ZFC3H1 Co-target Short Low-Exon Transcripts
  • UAP56 N-Terminal Domain Mediates TREX-2-like Complex Binding
  • PCID2–SEM1 Confers Specificity for UAP56 Over Other Helicases
Main Claim 2 –

GANP, LENG8, and SAC3D1 Localize to Distinct Compartments

Supporting evidence

  • PAXT Targets Show Elevated Nuclear-to-Cytoplasmic RNA Ratios
Main Claim 3 –

PAXT and TREX-2 Compete for Shared RNA Substrates

Supporting evidence

  • UAP56 RNA Release Is Required for PAXT-Mediated Decay
  • PAXT Depletion Increases Target Protein Synthesis Opposing GANP
  • LENG8 and ZFC3H1 mRNAs Are Autoregulated by PAXT

Abstract

Eukaryotic genomes generate a plethora of polyadenylated (pA+) RNAs, that are packaged into ribonucleoprotein particles (RNPs). To ensure faithful gene expression, functional pA+ RNPs, including protein-coding RNPs, are exported to the cytoplasm, while transcripts within non-functional pA+ RNPs are degraded in the nucleus. How cells distinguish these opposing fates remains unknown. The DExD-box ATPase UAP56/DDX39B is a central component of functional pA+ RNPs, promoting their docking to the nuclear pore complex (NPC)-anchored ‘transcription and export complex 2 (TREX-2)’ (ref.), which triggers transcript release from UAP56 to facilitate export (ref.). Here, we uncover that the ‘Poly(A) tail exosome targeting (PAXT)’ connection harbors its own TREX-2-like module, which releases pA+ RNAs from UAP56 for decay by the nuclear exosome. The core of this module consists of a LENG8-PCID2-SEM1 (LENG8-PS) trimer, which we show is structurally and functionally equivalent to the central GANP-PCID2-SEM1 (GANP-PS) trimer of TREX-2. Mutagenesis and transcriptomic data demonstrate that the nuclear fate of pA+ RNPs is governed by the contending actions of nucleoplasmic PAXT and NPC-associated TREX-2, which interpret RNA-bound UAP56 as a signal for RNA decay or export, respectively. As RNA targets of PAXT are generally short and intron-poor, we propose an overall model for pA+ RNP fate determination, whereby the distinct sub-nuclear localizations of PAXT and TREX-2 govern the degradation of short non-functional pA+ RNAs while allowing export of their longer and functional counterparts.

Related papers

How the QED Score works

QED Score is a validated AI-based quality metric that evaluates life science papers on two dimensions: originality and validity. Each manuscript is anonymized, broken down into its claims and supporting evidence, and examined by specialized AI agents for statistical rigor, consistency across figures, and fit with the existing literature. Scores are percentile ranks, so they're comparable across fields. In blinded tests, expert professors sided with QED Score over journal rank in 75% of decisive cases.
Read the methodology

Free access for academic researchers

Create your free QED account to validate your research, strengthen grant proposals, and uncover scientific insights.
We've sent you an access link.
Please check your inbox.

Didn't get your email? Check your spam folder or reach out to info@qedscience.com

Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Looking for QED for pharma, biotech or life science organizations?