Home
 /
Papers
 /
Cancer Biology
 /
Inflammatory memory disables a DDR1 degradation checkpoint to enable pancreatic cancer growth
Preprint
Open access
V1
Top 1% · Validated by QED

Inflammatory memory disables a DDR1 degradation checkpoint to enable pancreatic cancer growth

Fei Yang, Bo Lin, Zihang Yuan +8 more
April 2026
 ·
bioRxiv
 ·
DOI 
10.64898/2026.04.01.715820
94
%
Reproducible
QED Impressions
This paper passed independent validation.
QED's automated review checked the evidence supporting each claim, the statistical methods, and whether the results are reproducible from the data provided.

It ranks in the top 1% of preprints assessed in Cancer Biology this quarter.
Run full QED analysis
Read paper
Save

Why this is interesting

Discovering that AMPK drives DDR1 degradation via FBXW2, and that inflammatory cytokines permanently disable this brake through FBXW2 promoter methylation, this paper reveals how transient inflammation locks PDAC cells into a stromal-resistant, pro-tumorigenic state.

QED claims analysis

Summary

A metabolic-inflammatory checkpoint controls pancreatic cancer progression through regulated DDR1 receptor turnover, whereby intact collagen induces AMPK-mediated DDR1 phosphorylation and FBXW2-dependent degradation that restrains tumor growth, but inflammatory cytokines establish durable epigenetic memory through FBXW2 promoter methylation that disables this degradation pathway and enables sustained DDR1 signaling and tumor progression independent of stromal constraints.

See full analysis
Main Claim 1 –

FBXW2 Promotes Proteasomal DDR1 Degradation to Suppress PDAC

Supporting evidence

  • FBXW2 Loss Bypasses Intact Collagen Growth Restriction In Vivo
  • FBXW2-Driven DDR1 Degradation Restrains Early PanIN Formation
  • Collagen, Energy Stress, and Inflammation Integrate to Control DDR1
Main Claim 2 –

Intact Collagen Triggers Metabolic Stress Driving AMPK-Dependent DDR1 Degradation

Supporting evidence

  • AMPK Enhances FBXW2–DDR1 Binding to Promote DDR1 Ubiquitination
Main Claim 3 –

AMPK Phosphorylates DDR1 T519 to Enable FBXW2-Mediated Degradation

Supporting evidence

  • DDR1 T519 Phosphorylation Recruits FBXW2; K663 Is Ubiquitinated
  • Degradation-Resistant DDR1 Sustains Metabolism and Growth Under Stromal Constraint
Main Claim 4 –

FBXW2 Is Silenced by Promoter Hypermethylation in Human PDAC

Supporting evidence

  • Low FBXW2 and Low DDR1 pT519 Predict Poor PDAC Survival
  • IL-17A and IL-8 Induce FBXW2 Promoter Methylation and Silencing
  • Inflammatory Priming Creates Lasting FBXW2 Silencing Sustaining DDR1 Signaling

Abstract

Inflammation and stroma remodeling regulate pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), but how or if these cues are integrated at the molecular level remains unclear. Here, we identify a metabolic checkpoint that controls the stability of the collagen receptor DDR1, and subsequent tumorigenesis. We show that defective Col-I remodeling deprives PDAC cells of the high affinity DDR1 ligand, ¾Col-I, resulting in reduced ATP and activation of AMPK. AMPK phosphorylates DDR1 at T519, promoting its recognition by the E3 ubiquitin ligase adaptor FBXW2 and subsequent degradation. Importantly, this degradation pathway can be disabled by inflammatory signaling. Exposure to inflammatory cytokines induces methylation-dependent silencing of FBXW2, which establishes an inflammatory memory that preserves DDR1 stability, enabling sustained ligand-triggered receptor oligomerization and downstream NF-κB-NRF2 signaling even in restrictive stromal environments. Together, these findings identify regulated receptor turnover as a mechanism through which stromal architecture, metabolic state, and inflammatory memory are integrated to control PDAC progression.

Related papers

How the QED Score works

QED Score is a validated AI-based quality metric that evaluates life science papers on two dimensions: originality and validity. Each manuscript is anonymized, broken down into its claims and supporting evidence, and examined by specialized AI agents for statistical rigor, consistency across figures, and fit with the existing literature. Scores are percentile ranks, so they're comparable across fields. In blinded tests, expert professors sided with QED Score over journal rank in 75% of decisive cases.
Read the methodology

Free access for academic researchers

Create your free QED account to validate your research, strengthen grant proposals, and uncover scientific insights.
We've sent you an access link.
Please check your inbox.

Didn't get your email? Check your spam folder or reach out to info@qedscience.com

Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Looking for QED for pharma, biotech or life science organizations?