Home
 /
Papers
 /
Genomics
 /
Evolutionary transfer learning enables organism-wide inference of mammalian enhancer landscapes
Preprint
Open access
V1
Top 1% · Validated by QED

Evolutionary transfer learning enables organism-wide inference of mammalian enhancer landscapes

Chengxiang Qiu, Riza M. Daza, Ian C. Welsh +15 more
April 2026
 ·
bioRxiv
 ·
DOI 
10.64898/2026.04.07.717039
94
%
Reproducible
QED Impressions
This paper passed independent validation.
QED's automated review checked the evidence supporting each claim, the statistical methods, and whether the results are reproducible from the data provided.

It ranks in the top 1% of preprints assessed in Genomics this quarter.
Run full QED analysis
Read paper
Save

Why this is interesting

By treating evolutionary sequence diversity across 241 mammals as a supervisory signal, STEAM unlocks genome-wide enhancer maps for human developmental cell types otherwise experimentally inaccessible, reframing model organisms as indispensable training data for human regulatory genomics.

QED claims analysis

Summary

Evolutionary transfer learning enables organism-wide inference of mammalian enhancer landscapes by leveraging the mismatch between rapidly evolving cis-regulatory sequences and slowly evolving trans-acting regulatory programs: training deep learning models on a 3.9-million-cell mouse developmental chromatin accessibility atlas augmented with syntenic orthologs from 241 mammalian genomes achieves robust cross-species prediction of cell-type-specific enhancers, including successful inference of human-specific regulatory elements inaccessible to direct profiling.

See full analysis
Main Claim 1 –

Mouse developmental scATAC-seq maps 36 classes and 140 types

Supporting evidence

  • Iterative multimodal annotation defines 13 lineages, 36 classes, 140 types
Main Claim 2 –

Evolution-naive models overpredict repeats and mix promoter-enhancer grammar

Main Claim 3 –

Syntenic evolutionary coherence filters isolate distal enhancers and reduce artifacts

Supporting evidence

  • Evolution-aware enhancers show intermediate conservation and predict nearby gene expression
Main Claim 4 –

STEAM uses 241-mammal syntenic orthologs to improve cross-species enhancer prediction

Supporting evidence

  • STEAM predicts human-specific enhancers validated by fetal chromatin accessibility

Abstract

Understanding and modeling how the human genome encodes gene regulatory programs for thousands of cell types remains a central challenge in genomics and machine learning. However, most human cell types emerge during embryonic, fetal, and pediatric development which are inaccessible to comprehensive molecular profiling. To overcome this, we hypothesized that the mismatch in evolutionary rates between cis-acting enhancers (fast) and the trans-acting regulatory programs that interpret them (slow) creates an opportunity for ‘evolutionary transfer learning’. Specifically, models trained to predict cell type-specific enhancers in one species should generalize to the orthologous cell types and enhancers of related species. To test this, we generated a single-cell atlas of chromatin accessibility spanning mouse embryonic day 10 (E10) to birth (P0). Using combinatorial indexing, we profiled 3.9 million nuclei from 36 staged embryos, resolving genome-wide accessibility in 36 cell classes and 140 cell types. With the goal of identifying distal enhancers for all cell classes, we trained a series of multi-output deep learning models (CREsted), each addressing limitations of the preceding approach. An ‘evolution-naive’ model achieves strong performance on heldout peaks, but exhibited two failure modes during genome-wide inference: overprediction at tandem repeats and conflation of promoter and distal enhancer grammars. An ‘evolution-aware’ model resolves these by regrouping accessible regions based on functional coherence across syntenic orthologs, but fails to generalize across species — suggesting insufficient sequence diversity during training. Finally, STEAM (Synteny-aware Transfer learning for Enhancer Activity Modeling), our ‘evolution-augmented’ model, expands the training corpus to include enhancer orthologs from up to 241 mammalian genomes (Zoonomia) in a synteny-supervised manner. This increases the effective data scale by up to 195-fold, markedly improving generalization across mammals despite greater label noise. We apply STEAM predict enhancers for all major developmental lineages throughout the human, mouse (HumMus) and 239 additional mammalian genomes (BabaGanoush), i.e. 32 × 241 = 7,712 genome-wide enhancer tracks. Together, our results unify advances in single-cell profiling, deep learning, and comparative genomics into a framework for the evolutionary transfer learning of noncoding regulatory grammars. More broadly, our work supports the view that model organisms and evolutionarily diverse genomes are indispensable resources for accelerating the AI-enabled exploration of human biology.

Note

An interactive version of this preprint, together with count matrices, CREsted models, prediction tracks, code and reproducible figures, is available at this link (ref).

Related papers

How the QED Score works

QED Score is a validated AI-based quality metric that evaluates life science papers on two dimensions: originality and validity. Each manuscript is anonymized, broken down into its claims and supporting evidence, and examined by specialized AI agents for statistical rigor, consistency across figures, and fit with the existing literature. Scores are percentile ranks, so they're comparable across fields. In blinded tests, expert professors sided with QED Score over journal rank in 75% of decisive cases.
Read the methodology

Free access for academic researchers

Create your free QED account to validate your research, strengthen grant proposals, and uncover scientific insights.
We've sent you an access link.
Please check your inbox.

Didn't get your email? Check your spam folder or reach out to info@qedscience.com

Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Looking for QED for pharma, biotech or life science organizations?