Home
 /
Papers
 /
Neuroscience
 /
Distinct Filament Conformation for Receptor-Bound Amyloid-ß from Alzheimer’s Disease Brain
Preprint
Open access
V1
Top 1% · Validated by QED

Distinct Filament Conformation for Receptor-Bound Amyloid-ß from Alzheimer’s Disease Brain

Mikhail A. Kostylev, Carmen Butan, Graham P. Roseman +3 more
October 2025
 ·
bioRxiv
 ·
DOI 
10.1101/2025.10.10.681740
94
%
Reproducible
QED Impressions
This paper passed independent validation.
QED's automated review checked the evidence supporting each claim, the statistical methods, and whether the results are reproducible from the data provided.

It ranks in the top 1% of preprints assessed in Neuroscience this quarter.
Run full QED analysis
Read paper
Save

Why this is interesting

By purifying receptor-bound Aβ directly from human Alzheimer's brain, this paper overturns decades of oligomer-focused research, establishing that synaptotoxic Aβ forms distinct 65 nm filaments whose tips drive prion protein binding, redefining therapeutic targets entirely.

QED claims analysis

Summary

Receptor-bound amyloid-β in Alzheimer's disease brain exists as uniform 65 nm filaments that are ten-fold more abundant than free soluble amyloid-β, adopt two distinct atomic conformations with altered amino-terminal structure and helical twist compared to plaque-associated fibrils, and interact with prion protein receptors specifically at filament tips to mediate synaptic toxicity through a mechanism distinct from amyloid plaque pathology.

See full analysis
Main Claim 1 –

Receptor-bound amyloid-β is tenfold more abundant than free amyloid-β

Supporting evidence

  • PrPC deletion reduces receptor-bound amyloid-β pool by ~50%
Main Claim 2 –

Receptor-bound amyloid-β forms uniform 65-nm filaments of ~300 monomers

Supporting evidence

  • Receptor-bound amyloid-β elutes at ~650 kDa, ~250-monomer assemblies
  • Receptor-bound amyloid-β is enriched for N-terminal epitopes versus plaques
Main Claim 3 –

PrPC binds amyloid-β filament tips with >20-fold higher affinity

Supporting evidence

  • Immunogold localizes PrPC binding within 5 nm of filament tips
  • Receptor-bound amyloid-β drives synaptic loss in human iPSC-derived neurons
  • PrPC tip-caps amyloid-β filaments to inhibit polymerization
Main Claim 4 –

Receptor-bound amyloid-β has two conformations with distinct Q15 and twist

Supporting evidence

  • Two receptor-bound conformations differ in hydrogen bonding and coexist

Abstract

Alzheimer’s disease is triggered by amyloid-ß, with symptoms linked to synapse loss. Oligomeric amyloid-ß, rather than monomeric or fibrillar amyloid-ß, has been proposed to be the proximate mechanistic cause, but the relevant molecular characteristics have remained unclear. Here, we define a distinct receptor-bound amyloid-ß pool in Alzheimer’s brain by release with a receptor antagonist and purification to homogeneity. Receptor-bound amyloid-ß is ten times more abundant than free unbound amyloid-ß. The amyloid-ß associated with receptor is composed of 65 nm long filaments with prion protein binding at its tips. There is no evidence for an oligomeric Aß state interacting with human brain receptors. Cryo-electron microscopy shows two symmetric S-shaped monomers per filament rung. The tilt between rung monomers, twist along the filament axis, amino terminal conformation and amyloid seeding properties distinguish this structure from plaque-associated amyloid-ß filaments of the same brain. High tip:length ratio is critical for prion protein receptor interaction and synaptic damage. Characterizing receptor-bound amyloid-ß filament provides insight into neuronal dysfunction separate from plaque aggregation.

Related papers

How the QED Score works

QED Score is a validated AI-based quality metric that evaluates life science papers on two dimensions: originality and validity. Each manuscript is anonymized, broken down into its claims and supporting evidence, and examined by specialized AI agents for statistical rigor, consistency across figures, and fit with the existing literature. Scores are percentile ranks, so they're comparable across fields. In blinded tests, expert professors sided with QED Score over journal rank in 75% of decisive cases.
Read the methodology

Free access for academic researchers

Create your free QED account to validate your research, strengthen grant proposals, and uncover scientific insights.
We've sent you an access link.
Please check your inbox.

Didn't get your email? Check your spam folder or reach out to info@qedscience.com

Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Looking for QED for pharma, biotech or life science organizations?