Home
 /
Papers
 /
Synthetic Biology
 /
De novo design of hundreds of functional GPCR-targeting antibodies enabled by scaling test-time compute
Preprint
Open access
V1
Top 1% · Validated by QED

De novo design of hundreds of functional GPCR-targeting antibodies enabled by scaling test-time compute

Nabla Bio, Surojit Biswas
May 2025
 ·
bioRxiv
 ·
DOI 
10.1101/2025.05.28.656709
94
%
Reproducible
QED Impressions
This paper passed independent validation.
QED's automated review checked the evidence supporting each claim, the statistical methods, and whether the results are reproducible from the data provided.

It ranks in the top 1% of preprints assessed in Synthetic Biology this quarter.
Run full QED analysis
Read paper
Save

Why this is interesting

Scaling test-time computation delivers the first computationally designed GPCR antibody agonists, overturning the assumption that de novo design cannot access receptor activation and establishing inference-time reasoning as a new axis for drug discovery.

QED claims analysis

Summary

Scaling test-time computation through iterative introspection enables de novo design of functional GPCR-targeting antibodies with >60-fold improved success rates, yielding hundreds of picomolar-affinity designs that include the first computationally designed antibody GPCR agonists and can be efficiently optimized into diverse therapeutic leads using single experimental examples to guide generation.

See full analysis
Main Claim 1 –

Test-Time Introspection Boosts De Novo Antibody Success Rates ≥20-Fold

Main Claim 2 –

Test-Time Scaling Improves GPCR Antibody Design Success >60-Fold

Supporting evidence

  • Test-Time Scaled VHHs Achieve High Affinity and Developability
Main Claim 3 –

De Novo Designed Antibodies Act as CXCR7 GPCR Agonists

Main Claim 4 –

Single-Hit Steering Generates Hundreds of Improved CXCR7 Agonists

Abstract

We present significant advances in de novo antibody design against G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) enabled by scaling the test-time compute used by our generative protein design system, JAM. We de novo design hundreds of VHH (single domain) antibodies against CXCR4 and CXCR7, with top designs showing picomolar to low-nanomolar affinities, high selectivity, and favorable early-stage developability profiles, matching or outperforming clinical-stage molecules in these dimensions. Further, high affinity designs potently modulate receptor function, with most acting as antagonists (inhibitors) and, strikingly, a subset functioning as agonists (activators) of CXCR7 — the first antibody agonists reported for this receptor, and the first computationally designed antibody GPCR agonists of any kind. Using a single experimentally validated agonist to further prompt JAM, we generate over 300 additional diverse agonists with superior properties, including a design with agonism EC50 rivaling that of CXCR7’s natural ligand, SDF1α. These results show that increasing the “reasoning” capacity of biomolecular generative models by scaling test-time computation will enable them to solve increasingly difficult problems in drug design.

Related papers

How the QED Score works

QED Score is a validated AI-based quality metric that evaluates life science papers on two dimensions: originality and validity. Each manuscript is anonymized, broken down into its claims and supporting evidence, and examined by specialized AI agents for statistical rigor, consistency across figures, and fit with the existing literature. Scores are percentile ranks, so they're comparable across fields. In blinded tests, expert professors sided with QED Score over journal rank in 75% of decisive cases.
Read the methodology

Free access for academic researchers

Create your free QED account to validate your research, strengthen grant proposals, and uncover scientific insights.
We've sent you an access link.
Please check your inbox.

Didn't get your email? Check your spam folder or reach out to info@qedscience.com

Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Looking for QED for pharma, biotech or life science organizations?