Home
 /
Papers
 /
Genomics
 /
A global view of human centromere variation and evolution
Preprint
Open access
V1
Top 1% · Validated by QED

A global view of human centromere variation and evolution

Shenghan Gao, Keisuke K. Oshima, Shu-Cheng Chuang +9 more
December 2025
 ·
bioRxiv
 ·
DOI 
10.64898/2025.12.09.693231
94
%
Reproducible
QED Impressions
This paper passed independent validation.
QED's automated review checked the evidence supporting each claim, the statistical methods, and whether the results are reproducible from the data provided.

It ranks in the top 1% of preprints assessed in Genomics this quarter.
Run full QED analysis
Read paper
Save

Why this is interesting

This study transforms centromeres from genomic black boxes into tractable evolutionary loci—assembling 2,110 complete sequences to reveal archaic introgression, >50-fold chromosome-specific mutation rates, and sequence-driven kinetochore positioning across human populations.

QED claims analysis

Summary

Complete assembly and characterization of 2,110 human centromeres from diverse global populations reveals extensive previously unknown sequence diversity (226 novel haplotypes and 1,870 new α-satellite HOR variants), demonstrates that kinetochore positioning is non-random and determined by underlying sequence architecture (preferentially residing on high-identity, low-entropy sequences), and establishes that centromeres exhibit >50-fold variation in mutation rates across chromosomes with the kinetochore site itself being the most rapidly mutating region (twofold higher SNV rates than surrounding sequences), supporting a model in which genetic and epigenetic landscapes co-evolve through an evolutionary 'arms race' between centromeric DNA and proteins.

See full analysis
Main Claim 1 –

Global centromeres reveal 226 haplotypes and 1,870 HOR variants

Supporting evidence

  • Kinetochore-forming HOR array lengths vary by chromosome and ancestry
  • Large duplications, deletions, and inversions reshape centromeres on ten chromosomes
  • Rare acrocentric recombination forms hybrid chromosome 13/22 centromeres
Main Claim 2 –

Six percent of centromeres have heritable multiple kinetochore sites

Supporting evidence

  • Mobile element insertions affect 30% of centromeres, enriched on chr16 kinetochore
Main Claim 3 –

Kinetochore position is sequence-structured and chromosome-biased

Supporting evidence

  • Kinetochore sites occupy higher-identity, lower-entropy α-satellite sequences
  • CENP-A enrichment confirms CDRs mark functional kinetochore sites
Main Claim 4 –

Centromere haplotypes show million-year divergence and archaic introgression

Supporting evidence

  • Archaic-specific k-mers implicate introgression in chr10/21 centromere haplotypes
  • Recent chr1 and chr4 centromere duplications arose within 10,000 years

Abstract

Centromeres are essential for accurate chromosome segregation during cell division, yet their highly repetitive sequence has historically hindered their complete assembly and characterization. Consequently, the full spectrum of centromere diversity across individuals, populations, and evolutionary contexts remains largely unexplored. Here, we address this gap in knowledge by assembling and characterizing 2,110 complete human centromeres from a diverse cohort of individuals representing 5 continental and 28 population groups. By developing a novel suite of bioinformatic tools tailored for centromeric regions, we uncover previously unknown variation within centromeres, including 226 novel centromere haplotypes and 1,870 new α-satellite higher-order repeat (HOR) variants. We find that mobile element insertions are present in 30% of centromeres, with chromosome 16 harboring Alu elements within the kinetochore site at an 11-fold higher frequency than expected. While most centromeres have a single kinetochore site, 6% of them have di-kinetochores, and <<1% have tri-kinetochores, which we confirm with long-read CENP-A CUT&RUN, DiMeLo-seq, and multi-generational inheritance. We further show that the position of the kinetochore is not random and is, instead, closely associated with the underlying sequence and structure of the centromere. To understand the nature of evolutionary change, we compared 2,110 complete human centromeres to 5,747 complete centromeres recently assembled from the Human Pangenome Reference Consortium. We show that centromeres have a >50-fold variation in mutation rate, with the most rapidly mutating centromeres on chromosome 1 and the slowest mutating centromeres on chromosome Y. Additionally, a subset of centromeres show evidence of introgression from archaic hominins, shaping their sequence, structure, and evolutionary history. We validate these centromere mutation rates in a four-generation family, spanning 28 family members and 483 accurately assembled centromeres, and show that the kinetochore site is the most rapidly mutating region in the centromere, with twofold more single-nucleotide variants than the rest of the centromeric α-satellite HOR array on average. We propose a model that reveals an ‘arms race’ between centromeric sequence and proteins, with frequent mutations within the site of the kinetochore that lead to changes in genetic and epigenetic landscapes and, ultimately, rapid evolution of these critically important regions.

Related papers

How the QED Score works

QED Score is a validated AI-based quality metric that evaluates life science papers on two dimensions: originality and validity. Each manuscript is anonymized, broken down into its claims and supporting evidence, and examined by specialized AI agents for statistical rigor, consistency across figures, and fit with the existing literature. Scores are percentile ranks, so they're comparable across fields. In blinded tests, expert professors sided with QED Score over journal rank in 75% of decisive cases.
Read the methodology

Free access for academic researchers

Create your free QED account to validate your research, strengthen grant proposals, and uncover scientific insights.
We've sent you an access link.
Please check your inbox.

Didn't get your email? Check your spam folder or reach out to info@qedscience.com

Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Looking for QED for pharma, biotech or life science organizations?