Home
 /
Papers
 /
Systems Biology
 /
A global genetic interaction map of a human cell reveals conserved principles of genetic networks
Preprint
Open access
V1
Top 1% · Validated by QED

A global genetic interaction map of a human cell reveals conserved principles of genetic networks

Maximilian Billmann, Michael Costanzo, Xiang Zhang +82 more
July 2025
 ·
bioRxiv
 ·
DOI 
10.1101/2025.06.30.662193
94
%
Reproducible
QED Impressions
This paper passed independent validation.
QED's automated review checked the evidence supporting each claim, the statistical methods, and whether the results are reproducible from the data provided.

It ranks in the top 1% of preprints assessed in Systems Biology this quarter.
Run full QED analysis
Read paper
Save

Why this is interesting

What yeast genetics made possible in model organisms, this paper now delivers for human cells: a genome-scale genetic interaction network that proves cross-species conservation, decodes cancer vulnerabilities, and reveals disease-modifying therapeutic targets.

QED claims analysis

Summary

Systematic analysis of ~4 million gene pairs in HAP1 cells reveals ~90,000 genetic interactions that organize into a hierarchical functional network mirroring protein complexes, pathways, and cellular compartments, demonstrating that fundamental principles of genetic network topology are conserved from yeast to human cells and that genetic interactions provide orthogonal functional information to cancer cell line co-essentiality networks for revealing molecular mechanisms underlying disease gene dependencies.

See full analysis
Main Claim 1 –

Genome-wide CRISPR identifies essential and fitness genes in HAP1

Main Claim 2 –

Genome-scale HAP1 screens map 88,933 human genetic interactions

Supporting evidence

  • CRISPR KO recapitulates PTAR1 interactions and adds vesicle-traffic links
  • HAP1 genetic interaction hubs correlate with expression, fitness, conservation
  • Essential genes show elevated, positively biased interactions in HAP1
  • Paralogs are strongly enriched for negative genetic interactions in HAP1
Main Claim 3 –

HAP1 profile similarity network reveals hierarchical functional gene modules

Supporting evidence

  • Profile similarity network annotates 113 poorly characterized human genes
  • Genetic interactions overlap PPIs and show complex-level interaction coherence
  • Negative interactions preferentially connect functionally related genes in HAP1
  • Positive interactions mainly connect different bioprocesses in HAP1
  • Suppression interactions are 4% of positives and highly informative
Main Claim 4 –

Negative genetic interaction module connectivity is conserved yeast-to-human

Supporting evidence

  • About 7% of ortholog-pair genetic interactions are yeast–human conserved
  • PTAR1/ECM9 interactions support prenylation–palmitoylation activation of YKT6

Abstract

We generated a genome-scale, genetic interaction network from the analysis of more than 4 million double mutants in the haploid human cell line, HAP1. The network maps ∼90,000 genetic interactions, including thousands of extreme synthetic lethal and genetic suppression interactions. Genetic interaction profiles enabled assembly of a hierarchical model of cell function, including modules corresponding to protein complexes, pathways, biological processes, and cellular compartments. Comparative analyses showed that general principles of genetic networks are conserved from yeast to human cells. A genetic interaction network mapped in a single genetic background complements the DepMap gene co-essentiality network, recapitulating many of the same biological connections and also capturing unique functional information to reveal roles of uncharacterized genes and molecular determinants of specific cancer cell line genetic dependencies.

Related papers

How the QED Score works

QED Score is a validated AI-based quality metric that evaluates life science papers on two dimensions: originality and validity. Each manuscript is anonymized, broken down into its claims and supporting evidence, and examined by specialized AI agents for statistical rigor, consistency across figures, and fit with the existing literature. Scores are percentile ranks, so they're comparable across fields. In blinded tests, expert professors sided with QED Score over journal rank in 75% of decisive cases.
Read the methodology

Free access for academic researchers

Create your free QED account to validate your research, strengthen grant proposals, and uncover scientific insights.
We've sent you an access link.
Please check your inbox.

Didn't get your email? Check your spam folder or reach out to info@qedscience.com

Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Looking for QED for pharma, biotech or life science organizations?