Home
 /
Papers
 /
Biochemistry
 /
A bipartite mechanism for condensin II activation in mitosis
Preprint
Open access
V1
Top 1% · Validated by QED

A bipartite mechanism for condensin II activation in mitosis

Damla Tetiker, Kumiko Samejima, Yan Li +7 more
February 2026
 ·
bioRxiv
 ·
DOI 
10.64898/2026.02.02.703380
94
%
Reproducible
QED Impressions
This paper passed independent validation.
QED's automated review checked the evidence supporting each claim, the statistical methods, and whether the results are reproducible from the data provided.

It ranks in the top 1% of preprints assessed in Biochemistry this quarter.
Run full QED analysis
Read paper
Save

Why this is interesting

By revealing that M18BP1 both relieves condensin II autoinhibition and directly anchors DNA, this work overturns the view that activators merely derepress SMC complexes, establishing a new paradigm for mitotic chromosome organization.

QED claims analysis

Summary

Human condensin II is held in an autoinhibited state during interphase through sequestration of the NCAPH2 Neck domain by the NCAPD3 Tail, and is activated at mitotic entry through a bipartite mechanism in which CDK1-phosphorylated M18BP1 both displaces the autoinhibitory NCAPD3 Tail to enable DNA capture and directly stabilizes DNA loop formation by forming a composite DNA-anchoring interface with NCAPG2-NCAPH2.

See full analysis
Main Claim 1 –

NCAPD3 Tail sequesters NCAPH2 Neck on NCAPG2, autoinhibiting condensin II

Supporting evidence

  • ATP monomerizes condensin II while preserving NCAPD3 Tail autoinhibitory belt
  • ATP disrupts condensin II dimers; monomers are loop-extruding species
Main Claim 2 –

NCAPD3 Tail deletion triggers M18BP1-independent premature chromosome condensation

Supporting evidence

  • NCAPD3 Tail mutants increase condensin II ATPase and loop extrusion
Main Claim 3 –

CDK1-phosphorylated M18BP1 activates condensin II by displacing NCAPD3 Tail

Supporting evidence

  • M18BP1 releases NCAPH2 Neck to reorganize condensin II for DNA capture
  • M18BP1 competes with NCAPD3 Tail for NCAPG2 binding sites
Main Claim 4 –

M18BP1 stabilizes condensin II DNA loops via NCAPG2–NCAPH2 anchoring

Supporting evidence

  • Activated condensin II forms DNA clamp enclosing DNA within heads
  • M18BP1 basic linker is required for composite NCAPG2–NCAPH2 DNA binding

Abstract

Human condensin II is a constitutively nuclear molecular motor that initiates chromosome organization in early mitosis. How condensin II is activated specifically in mitosis remains unknown. Here, we describe the molecular mechanism underlying condensin II auto-repression and activation. By determining multiple structural states of condensin II, we discovered that an autoinhibitory tail within the NCAPD3 subunit (NCAPD3Tail) holds the complex in a conformation that is incompatible with DNA capture. Deletion of NCAPD3Tail spontaneously activates condensin II in cells, illuminating its autoinhibitory role in vivo. We further show this translates to increased loop DNA formation by condensin II in vitro. Direct competition for the NCAPD3Tail binding site on condensin II enables the putative activator protein M18BP1 to liberate a key DNA-binding element in the NCAPH2 N-terminus, enabling DNA capture. Unexpectedly, M18BP1 not only relieves autoinhibition but also directly contributes to DNA organization by forming a positively charged loop that enhances DNA-anchoring by condensin II. Together, these findings reveal a bipartite activation mechanism wherein M18BP1 relieves autorepression, and renders condensin II biochemically competent to form stable DNA loops, ensuring highly stringent regulation of mitotic chromosome formation.

Related papers

How the QED Score works

QED Score is a validated AI-based quality metric that evaluates life science papers on two dimensions: originality and validity. Each manuscript is anonymized, broken down into its claims and supporting evidence, and examined by specialized AI agents for statistical rigor, consistency across figures, and fit with the existing literature. Scores are percentile ranks, so they're comparable across fields. In blinded tests, expert professors sided with QED Score over journal rank in 75% of decisive cases.
Read the methodology

Free access for academic researchers

Create your free QED account to validate your research, strengthen grant proposals, and uncover scientific insights.
We've sent you an access link.
Please check your inbox.

Didn't get your email? Check your spam folder or reach out to info@qedscience.com

Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Looking for QED for pharma, biotech or life science organizations?