AI for research & evaluation
Researchers use QED Science’s validity engine to understand which claims hold up across scientific papers, grants, and their day-to-day work.
What is QED Science
Critical AI paper reviews
Have your paper broken into its core claims so that every gap is surfaced with tailored fixes, with your novel contributions separated from what's already known—and ranked against studies in your field, to maximize its impact when you publish it.
Critical AI grant reviews
Strengthen every aspect of your proposal, identify weaknesses in logic, background, feasibility, methodology, and internal consistency, and address them before you submit your proposal.
AI powered insights feed
Get personalized updates on new findings that are directly relevant to your work, wherever they appear. From studies that fill gaps in your knowledge to labs trying to answer the same questions you are.

The AI validity machine
For pharma, biotech, and life-science R&D, QED’s Validity Machine gives you a validated, foundational layer of data you can trust to support critical scientific decisions.
Ask it any scientific question, and it extracts every implicit and explicit claim across the full body of research, scores each of them for validity, and resolves contradictions between them. Providing you with a structured answer you can trust, backed by valid science.

QED does not train on any manuscripts or grants you upload. It comes pre-trained on the input of thousands of scientists all over the world, including Nobel laureatures.
QED is SOC 2 Type 2 compliant and ISO 27001 certified. Ensuring that your data protections are as rigorous as your science, with controls that are proven to work consistently over time. We're also fully GDPR compliant.
Other AI tools give you answers that might be true. Only QED gives you answers that are true. No summarizations or hallucinations. Just critical reviews, at scale.
Only you and anyone you explicitly invite. QED staff may access them for operational purposes (e.g., ensuring it was uploaded properly) or quality assurance (e.g., assessing our Critical Thinking AI performance). Our AI providers are contractually barred from training their own foundation models on your data.
QED will never publish, republish, or assert authorship over your unpublished work, nor interfere with any journal copyright you later choose. You retain full ownership of all manuscripts and data. You grant qed a revocable, non‑exclusive worldwide license solely to (i) generate feedback/reports, (ii) optionally train and evaluate QED's own models, and (iii) create anonymised, aggregated analytics.
No. QED is a private, pre‑submission tool. Reports stay inside your account unless you download or share them, so journal “originality” rules and copyright transfer agreements are unaffected (If a journal has a unique policy, we recommend checking its guidelines, just as you would with any lab notebook or pre‑print).
We strive to maintain industry standard data protection and security tools. We are extremely careful in how we use unpublished data in training. Your manuscript can indirectly affect our model parameters, but you are always in control of how your work gets published to the world.
Deleting a manuscript immediately ends qed’s licence to use it. All files are purged from live systems and scheduled for permanent erasure from encrypted backups within ≤ 30 days. Any model parameters already learned or anonymized stats remain because they cannot technically be rolled back, but they contain no identifiable text.
We log basic usage metrics (clicks, dwell‑time, ratings, etc.) to improve features, monitor security, and produce fully anonymised product‑analytics that may be shared or licensed. We never sell or share raw manuscripts or deleted content for marketing or any other purpose.
QED does not use submitted manuscripts to train it’s models to reproduce, rephrase, or refer to unpublished work, and we take strict measures to ensure that no unpublished content can be exposed or reconstructed in whole or in part unless the author explicitly chooses to share it through the qed platform. Submitted manuscripts may be used as input to improve QED’s ability to assess whether its feedback is helpful or likely to be acted upon.
Add the following sentence to the acknowledgements section:
Pre-submission review was conducted using qed Science (https://www.qedscience.com)
No. qed assumes that the data and results are genuine. Its current purpose is not to investigate fraud but to analyze, validate, and interpret the scientific reasoning and evidence presented in the work. In the future, additional capabilities will allow qed to flag signs of manipulation.
%20(1).png)